+ Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 7 of 39 FirstFirst ... 5678917 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 386

Thread: O/T:- Betting odds for US Election [The USA Politics Thread]

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    24,769
    I see Trump's odds in Iowa are drifting and about 3/4 of the bets are on the Democrats side now. Probably wagers made in light of the Selzer poll of course.

    Having said that, 'drifting' is pushing it a little as he's still around 2/9 and she's at 10/3 with Bet365

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    1,606
    Quote Originally Posted by SwalePie View Post
    I see Trump's odds in Iowa are drifting and about 3/4 of the bets are on the Democrats side now. Probably wagers made in light of the Selzer poll of course.

    Having said that, 'drifting' is pushing it a little as he's still around 2/9 and she's at 10/3 with Bet365
    The Selzer Iowa Poll would normally just have been discounted as an error, but with the mainstream media jumping on it, it has scared a few punters.

    There's more to it than just Harris being projected to win by 3.00%. For a 'rogue poll' to work, there has to be high level of believability in it and the fact that Iowa was Democrat for quite a while (prior to Trump), leant an air of feasibility to the poll too.

    Choosing her own state, Iowa, to show that pro-Trump states could be turning against him, would cause maximum publicity - and boy did the outlets like CNN, MSNBC, NBC and The Atlantic give it some airplay.

    Now the US Polls have for the last two elections been way out, so it's possible that Ann Selzer is 100% correct. Selzer was also the best poller in Iowa in 2016 and 2020, when others called it to Clinton and Biden.

    We'll soon find out .

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    6,553
    Quote Originally Posted by Lullapie View Post

    The markets are factoring in a Trump win too. They are predicting a rise in the US$ if he wins, but a large fall if Harris wins. To me, that tells more about who is right for the US. Remember everyone, this is the US Election.

    I like my political leaders doing what is best for my country, not what is good for everyone else.
    Trump's publicly stated policy aim is actually to have a weaker dollar. He has always wanted that, even before he went into politics.

    It's just that if he goes ahead with his policies, particularly tariffs and deportations, everything is going to get more expensive in the USA. This means the Fed will raise interest rates to cool inflation and global investors will then pour money into US bonds to get a piece of the high interest rates.

    To do that they will have to sell their currencies and buy USD, hence the strengthening dollar (it's actually not really strengthening anymore but it was for a couple of weeks).

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    11,871
    Let's face it what a choice? I thought our politicians are bad but if these two are the best America can come up with God help them.

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    8,729
    Quote Originally Posted by i961pie View Post
    Let's face it what a choice? I thought our politicians are bad but if these two are the best America can come up with God help them.
    Agreed, the two candidates are both awful in different ways. You have to pick your poison.

    That said, I quite like some of the people that Trump has assembled behind him. Vivek Ramaswamy is on a completely different level to most politicians and has that private-sector zeal that's needed to make real change. He looks like a future president in waiting to me. RFK Junior may have some controversial views, but he seems genuinely motivated to tackle the issues contributing to poor health in the US. And I know they are not everyone's cup of tea, but I'd genuinely be interested to see what a combination of Elon Musk and Ron Paul could achieve by auditing the public sector, cutting the fat, and driving real efficiency. JD Vance is also a more competent VP than Walz as far as I'm concerned.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    1,606
    Quote Originally Posted by drillerpie View Post
    Trump's publicly stated policy aim is actually to have a weaker dollar. He has always wanted that, even before he went into politics.

    It's just that if he goes ahead with his policies, particularly tariffs and deportations, everything is going to get more expensive in the USA. This means the Fed will raise interest rates to cool inflation and global investors will then pour money into US bonds to get a piece of the high interest rates.

    To do that they will have to sell their currencies and buy USD, hence the strengthening dollar (it's actually not really strengthening anymore but it was for a couple of weeks).
    You're spouting much of what the left-wing fear-mongers' are spouting. What about concentration camps, forcing women to not have abortions if they want them, splitting up mixed race families and making the white partner marry another white partner. The list goes on and on - why didn't you mention those?

    The idea behind the tariffs, to anyone who understands the reason behind them, is to force massive US corporations to invest in America or to stop them from moving their factories overseas.

    This in turn will create US jobs and take people off welfare. The US is the biggest economy in the world and it has been decimated by Democrat policies over the last 30 years.

    You have to have lived there or have close contacts in the US to understand why nearly 75 million people voted for him in 2020.

    GM reducing production to nothing in Michigan, Apple making nearly all of their products in China, John Deere planning on closing their Pennsylvanian production plant and moving it to Mexico - again the list goes on and on. Trump threatened John Deere a few months ago with 200% tariffs if they moved to Mexico and they reversed their plans. See it works and he wasn't even President.

    Just as you and many others on here find it unbelievable how anyone could vote for Trump, for me I can't understand why anyone wouldn't. I am connected to a large business and commerce company and to me, his plans all stack up - I really have given up on people who don't get it.

    A strengthening dollar makes imports expensive - therefore, it's more cost effective to produce within the US - isn't THAT Trump's plan? The only thing that the US doesn't currently have is cheap energy - but he has a plan for that too. Incidentally his plan was also adopted by Kamala a few days after Trump announced it.
    Last edited by Lullapie; 05-11-2024 at 08:31 AM.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    1,606
    Quote Originally Posted by slack_pie View Post
    Agreed, the two candidates are both awful in different ways. You have to pick your poison.

    That said, I quite like some of the people that Trump has assembled behind him. Vivek Ramaswamy is on a completely different level to most politicians and has that private-sector zeal that's needed to make real change. He looks like a future president in waiting to me. RFK Junior may have some controversial views, but he seems genuinely motivated to tackle the issues contributing to poor health in the US. And I know they are not everyone's cup of tea, but I'd genuinely be interested to see what a combination of Elon Musk and Ron Paul could achieve by auditing the public sector, cutting the fat, and driving real efficiency. JD Vance is also a more competent VP than Walz as far as I'm concerned.
    Can you tell me the last election in any free country where either leader/candidate has been generally accepted as being a good choice?

    Or tell me the last US election when one of the candidates has been a good pick for everybody. It's generally the media who picks the leaders and tells you how they would be for you.

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    8,729
    Quote Originally Posted by Lullapie View Post
    Can you tell me the last election in any free country where either leader/candidate has been generally accepted as being a good choice?

    Or tell me the last US election when one of the candidates has been a good pick for everybody. It's generally the media who picks the leaders and tells you how they would be for you.
    Nope. There are often people behind them who seem competent, but I can't remember the last time a leadership race was fought between two outstanding candidates.
    Last edited by slack_pie; 05-11-2024 at 09:24 AM.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    6,553
    Quote Originally Posted by Lullapie View Post
    You're spouting much of what the left-wing fear-mongers' are spouting. What about concentration camps, forcing women to not have abortions if they want them, splitting up mixed race families and making the white partner marry another white partner. The list goes on and on - why didn't you mention those?

    The idea behind the tariffs, to anyone who understands the reason behind them, is to force massive US corporations to invest in America or to stop them from moving their factories overseas.

    This in turn will create US jobs and take people off welfare. The US is the biggest economy in the world and it has been decimated by Democrat policies over the last 30 years.

    You have to have lived there or have close contacts in the US to understand why nearly 75 million people voted for him in 2020.

    GM reducing production to nothing in Michigan, Apple making nearly all of their products in China, John Deere planning on closing their Pennsylvanian production plant and moving it to Mexico - again the list goes on and on. Trump threatened John Deere a few months ago with 200% tariffs if they moved to Mexico and they reversed their plans. See it works and he wasn't even President.

    Just as you and many others on here find it unbelievable how anyone could vote for Trump, for me I can't understand why anyone wouldn't. I am connected to a large business and commerce company and to me, his plans all stack up - I really have given up on people who don't get it.

    A strengthening dollar makes imports expensive - therefore, it's more cost effective to produce within the US - isn't THAT Trump's plan? The only thing that the US doesn't currently have is cheap energy - but he has a plan for that too. Incidentally his plan was also adopted by Kamala a few days after Trump announced it.
    Why are you so confrontational? Was I rude to you? In any case I didn't see you actually contest any of the points I made, just some unwarranted assumptions about me and a laundry list of unrelated arguments.

    By the way, a strong dollar does not make imports to the US more expensive. It's actually the opposite.

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    3,185
    Trumps shooter was a crap shot

Page 7 of 39 FirstFirst ... 5678917 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •