Quote Originally Posted by slack_pie View Post
I think the best way forward is to find a solution for both parties that's better than either a perpetual war of attrition or a major global conflict. That means both sides will have to concede something they want, but it's better than the alternatives. There's no easy way out of this, so I prefer the one that ends it sooner, with the least loss of life.

As the great Tony Benn said, war is the ultimate failure of diplomacy. The way forward is more diplomacy, more talks, and hopefully some kind of agreement. Controversial, I know, but I think that's better than launching missiles into Russian territory at this point.
Ok sure, war is bad and things are better when there isn't any war. No argument there.

Question was, in your opinion, to get to that point should the US equip the Ukrainians, should someone else equip the Ukrainians, or should nobody equip the Ukrainians?