I addressed your points BFP but whilst you asked for interaction you seem loath to reply.I didn?t address your question as I didn't disagree with you.
So can I take it you agree with the farmers and this policy should be changed.
You agree the winter fuel allowance was introduced too quickly.
I agree with you on the WASPI claims and that Starmer, Reeves and Kendall made an error standing with the placards.
I don?t agree with the farmers being taxed when the are passing farms onto their children but I 100% agree with non farmers being heavily taxed.
I disagree with you that the other things are bad faith right wing press if you think the optics in some of these stories (which are true) are bad we live in a different world.
I have no view on the Chagos Islands as I know nout about them but the speed and seemingly underhand way the deal was done again seem poor management.
You haven?t mentioned the ?22 billion black which it appears trying to fix with will in my opinion a ludicrous budget that will cost jobs, raise inflation and stunt growth. I believe this will need another budget with more tax rises. This government should have 5 years to see if it can fix things after a disastrous Tory government but I don?t believe it can.
I strongly believe that Brexit will be a good thing for the UK but like this government we will only know in years to come. I have no faith in the EU and its ludicrous parliament but wouldn?t be against a Common market although that may have been tried before.
We probably disagree about funding as I think more funding is needed in public services but it must be linked to wholesale changes in how things are run. We don?t need the money spend on more management which appears to have happened in the past.
I think I did apply those standards at the last election and didn?t vote for the incumbent government as they did not deserve my vote. I hope you will think the same in 2029 if this government does not deserve your vote.
I hope I have also answered in good faith




Reply With Quote