+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 65

Thread: Tony Stewart's Tactical Ploy / Strategy To Sell Season Tickets Next Season ?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    8,641
    Quote Originally Posted by Ericsladkilnhurst View Post
    What I would say Masbroughstreet, is that surely Tony Stewart has the final say on money allocated.
    But Paul Douglas has been associated with transfers, contracts etc.
    The Millers have been hit quite a few times in giving out long contracts, under valuing players when sold,
    with one big mistake was the Blackstock saga, which cost the club money.
    The club don't have a person on the board, who has football knowledge.
    So Stewart and Douglas have been running the club for 16 years, but the club "don't have a person on the board, who has football knowledge'.

    How does someone get 'football knowledge' and how long does it take?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    18,392
    Quote Originally Posted by KerrAvon View Post
    So Stewart and Douglas have been running the club for 16 years, but the club "don't have a person on the board, who has football knowledge'.

    How does someone get 'football knowledge' and how long does it take?
    On past & current dealings, transfers, contracts, losing players for pea-nuts or nothing,
    giving out long contracts to players past their best.
    That doe's not show knowledge or wisdom.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    5,673
    Quote Originally Posted by Ericsladkilnhurst View Post
    On past & current dealings, transfers, contracts, losing players for pea-nuts or nothing,
    giving out long contracts to players past their best.
    That doe's not show knowledge or wisdom.
    You compare us against 90% of other similar clubs like us over the last 15 seasons, I?d say it does.

    Bit of a sh!t show at the moment though.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    14,192
    Strange how the same people who could run the club successful when we left don valley and made us successful and probably the envy of several lower league clubs and fans. Go to not having a clue within 18 months.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    18,392
    Quote Originally Posted by KerrAvon View Post
    So Stewart and Douglas have been running the club for 16 years, but the club "don't have a person on the board, who has football knowledge'.

    How does someone get 'football knowledge' and how long does it take?
    To your question KerrAvon
    Tony Stewart & Paul Douglas running the club for 16 years, & how to gain football knowledge.

    Your answer comes from Chairman Tony Stewart every year.

    He says, " We have learnt from our mistakes "

    So there's your answer, Stewart & Douglas don't have the knowledge after 16 years,
    when Stewart spouts this out, making mistake after mistake.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    24,919
    I'm just amazed that TS will let Stevie blow a big chunk of his money in the transfer market and still be relegated anyway. Big mates by all accounts but I wouldn't want my mate to chuck all my money away.

    We all know a couple of our better players will go and get replaced by players, even if better on paper, will not want to play for him like the rest and just pick up a nice wage till the end of the season.

    We are knacked basically.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    8,641
    Quote Originally Posted by Ericsladkilnhurst View Post
    On past & current dealings, transfers, contracts, losing players for pea-nuts or nothing,
    giving out long contracts to players past their best.
    That doe's not show knowledge or wisdom.
    Well reading this board over the years, the position seems to be:

    1. If we sign a player who doesn't perform as anticipated then he should have been signed on a short contract (assuming that he would have been willing to accept that).
    2. If we sign a player who does well, he should have been signed on a long contract with no automatic release clause and with a huge sell on clause (assuming that he would have been willing to accept that).
    3. If we sell a successful player when the time remaining on his contract allows us to secure a fee we lack ambition.
    4. If a good player leaves for nothing because his contract expires, we should have sold him when we could have secured a fee.
    5. If we sell a player for a sum that the market deems appropriate we should have sold him for the monopoly money figure deemed appropriate on here.

    Does that sum it up? So 'football knowledge' is a euphemism for possessing a crystal ball and an ability to meet unrealistic expectations?

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    9,296
    Quote Originally Posted by caytonmiller View Post
    Strange how the same people who could run the club successful when we left don valley and made us successful and probably the envy of several lower league clubs and fans. Go to not having a clue within 18 months.
    Why is it strange?
    It happens all the time to businesses that don't appear to have a coherent plan, don't adapt to changing circumstances or are reactive rather than proactive.
    Rotherham United in a nutshell.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    9,296
    Quote Originally Posted by KerrAvon View Post
    Well reading this board over the years, the position seems to be:

    1. If we sign a player who doesn't perform as anticipated then he should have been signed on a short contract (assuming that he would have been willing to accept that).
    2. If we sign a player who does well, he should have been signed on a long contract with no automatic release clause and with a huge sell on clause (assuming that he would have been willing to accept that).
    3. If we sell a successful player when the time remaining on his contract allows us to secure a fee we lack ambition.
    4. If a good player leaves for nothing because his contract expires, we should have sold him when we could have secured a fee.
    5. If we sell a player for a sum that the market deems appropriate we should have sold him for the monopoly money figure deemed appropriate on here.

    Does that sum it up? So 'football knowledge' is a euphemism for possessing a crystal ball and an ability to meet unrealistic expectations?
    One thing is for sure. The people who say we should develop our own players through the academy (which we don't have) would probably be the first to be up in arms when we sold them regardless of the fees obtained.
    We have always been a selling club but whether we are any good at it is a moot point.
    It is hard to see our place in the food chain changing unless we happen to drop on a billionaire looking for a bit of a challenge which seems highly unlikely.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    14,192
    Quote Originally Posted by mellowmiller View Post
    Why is it strange?
    It happens all the time to businesses that don't appear to have a coherent plan, don't adapt to changing circumstances or are reactive rather than proactive.
    Rotherham United in a nutshell.
    So if it's not strange and the norm why are fans getting so upset. They must have known it was coming

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •