+ Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 28 of 126 FirstFirst ... 1826272829303878 ... LastLast
Results 271 to 280 of 1254

Thread: O/T:- Trump Presidency 2.0 [hic sunt dracones]

  1. #271
    The very act of Presidential pardon - of anybody, by any President - undermines the whole concept of justice and makes a mockery of the US's self-appointed 'beacon of democracy' tag.

    In other news, can anyone explain to me how Trump thinks tariffs work? I'm not sure if he thinks they work how they actually do.

  2. #272
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    1,606
    Quote Originally Posted by ThePieWhoCameIn View Post
    The very act of Presidential pardon - of anybody, by any President - undermines the whole concept of justice and makes a mockery of the US's self-appointed 'beacon of democracy' tag.

    In other news, can anyone explain to me how Trump thinks tariffs work? I'm not sure if he thinks they work how they actually do.
    Very good point about the pardons. Ultimately, they are 100% legal from both Presidents and so, unless the law is changed, they are what they are.


    The Trump tariff argument seems to be a contentious point for many. However for the few, it seems really easy to understand.

    I'll explain it how I explained it to someone over here.


    I want to buy a sports car and my wife is 100% against it. I say to my wife that if I spend 100 thousand quid on a second-hand Aston Martin, my mid-life crisis will be sated and I'll be a happy man.

    My wife says no way, that's too much money, but she says I could have a car for 50 thousand pounds.

    So I go out and buy a second hand Porsche 718 for 50 thousand and get the car that I really wanted in the first place.

    Happy wife, happy mid-life crisis gift for me.


    Trump threatens Tariffs and it's a case of who blinks first. Normally it's not Trump - maybe because of too much Botox.


    Listen to the story that Ben Shapiro was told by Trump about when Trump and Putin talked about Russia's 'expansion' plans. It sums up his MO in a snapshot.

    Peace through strength.

  3. #273
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    1,393
    Quote Originally Posted by Lullapie View Post
    However, compare this to Biden. He has pardoned more than 8,000 people. This is far more than any other President. Thousands of Biden's pardons were for serious criminals (murderers, pedophiles and people convicted of committing serious fraud). He has also given pre-emptive pardons to his family and many of his close supporters. Pre-emptive in the fact that they have been pardoned for acts that they haven't been charged or convicted of, but these acts might be discovered at a later date and the individuals may have had to give evidence against Biden. Many of Biden's pardons benefit him directly. As far as I can see, none of Trumps benefit him directly.

    If Trump had done the same, those with TDS would be shouting from their keyboards that all of those he had pardoned in advance had DEFINITELY done something wrong and he was only pardoning them to protect himself.
    I don't defend Biden pardoning anyone. Like most non-americans I think the idea of a presidential pardon subverts the role of the courts and democracy itself and should definitely be done away with.

    But the notion that Biden's pardons somehow benefit Biden (what evidence do you have which makes you believe this?) while Trumps don't is utterly ridiculous. The Jan 6 crowd Trump has pardoned tried to stop the guy that beat Trump last election getting certified as president. It was an incompetent attempt, sure, but a coup attempt nonetheless. You can't join the dots and see how Trump pardoning these people might embolden like-minded folk to do it again in the future? Seriously? This hasn't crossed your mind at all?

    You mention TDS... you have it. You are a huge victim of TDS. You see him acting in his self interests and ascribe these actions somehow to altruism. You see him acting out of ignorance (tariffs) and ascribe this to some master strategy for which there is zero evidence and doesn't make sense. Tariffs will hurt the US more than anyone else. Trump is threatening self-harm. The rest of the world is looking on in wonder at his stupidity, not quaking in their boots.

    You mention a mandate... well, he promised tariffs and is already walking it back. Trump doesn't care about mandates. His mandates last time were "lock her up!" (didn't even try) and "build that wall" (no wall was built) "and make Mexico pay for it" (Mexico did not, in fact, pay for it). All he achieved last time was stacking the supreme court and giving the wealthiest people a huge tax cut. Great achievements from a certain point of view, but not what he ran on.

  4. #274
    Join Date
    Aug 2024
    Posts
    1,005
    So Trump is set to ignore an international, arrest, warrant.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c78xzlxl3vjo

  5. #275
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    24,769
    Quote Originally Posted by Med Pie View Post
    So Trump is set to ignore an international, arrest, warrant.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c78xzlxl3vjo
    Sadly the USA is not a member of the ICC.

    "The US is not a state party to the Rome Statute. The US participated in the negotiations that led to the creation of the court. However, in 1998 the US was one of only seven countries - along with China, Iraq, Israel, Libya, Qatar, and Yemen - that voted against the Rome Statute."

  6. #276
    I don't agree with a Presidential pardon because I believe only the Judiciary should be contemplating any pardons after due process.

  7. #277
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    9,976
    Quote Originally Posted by Jampie View Post
    I don't defend Biden pardoning anyone. Like most non-americans I think the idea of a presidential pardon subverts the role of the courts and democracy itself and should definitely be done away with.

    But the notion that Biden's pardons somehow benefit Biden (what evidence do you have which makes you believe this?) while Trumps don't is utterly ridiculous. The Jan 6 crowd Trump has pardoned tried to stop the guy that beat Trump last election getting certified as president. It was an incompetent attempt, sure, but a coup attempt nonetheless. You can't join the dots and see how Trump pardoning these people might embolden like-minded folk to do it again in the future? Seriously? This hasn't crossed your mind at all?

    You mention TDS... you have it. You are a huge victim of TDS. You see him acting in his self interests and ascribe these actions somehow to altruism. You see him acting out of ignorance (tariffs) and ascribe this to some master strategy for which there is zero evidence and doesn't make sense. Tariffs will hurt the US more than anyone else. Trump is threatening self-harm. The rest of the world is looking on in wonder at his stupidity, not quaking in their boots.

    You mention a mandate... well, he promised tariffs and is already walking it back. Trump doesn't care about mandates. His mandates last time were "lock her up!" (didn't even try) and "build that wall" (no wall was built) "and make Mexico pay for it" (Mexico did not, in fact, pay for it). All he achieved last time was stacking the supreme court and giving the wealthiest people a huge tax cut. Great achievements from a certain point of view, but not what he ran on.
    Agree with that. Amidst all the usual nonsense and whataboutery admitting that people who would agree with him voted to release violent criminals isnt the great argument lullapie thinks it is.

  8. #278
    Quote Originally Posted by Lullapie View Post
    The Trump tariff argument seems to be a contentious point for many.
    It's not contentious to me, he can do what he likes. I'm just curious as to how he thinks they work.

    Your description is of tariffs as a threat in a negotiation. But what's he trying to achieve? He's mentioned it before as a revenue raising tool, to be able to cut other taxes. Where does he think that revenue comes from?

    And what concession is he expecting from the state of Canada in the next 2 days that he can demonstrate as a reason for not implementing tarrifs? Realistically? Baffling.

  9. #279
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    1,606
    Quote Originally Posted by ThePieWhoCameIn View Post
    It's not contentious to me, he can do what he likes. I'm just curious as to how he thinks they work.

    Your description is of tariffs as a threat in a negotiation. But what's he trying to achieve? He's mentioned it before as a revenue raising tool, to be able to cut other taxes. Where does he think that revenue comes from?

    And what concession is he expecting from the state of Canada in the next 2 days that he can demonstrate as a reason for not implementing tariffs? Realistically? Baffling.
    Don't take it personally, I meant generally.

    You mention Canada. Canada is one of the hardest trading markets to get into in the OECD. They have a high level of protectionism for their industries and products. However, the US is Canada's largest trading partner and so buys many Canadian goods. Most of those goods enter the US without any barriers. Goods sold by the US to Canada attract large tariffs.

    Funny........how people only mention tariffs that Trump is discussing, when many of the countries that he is threatening them with, have been putting additional taxes on US products for years.

    New Zealand are currently in a battle with Canada about illegal tariffs that Canada placed on New Zealand products. There was a free trade agreement signed by multiple dairy producing countries but Canada, after signing it, are refusing to remove the taxes. The US and Australia are also involved in the battle to bring Canada in line.

    https://www.ruralnewsgroup.co.nz/rur...-dairy-dispute

  10. #280
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    1,606
    Quote Originally Posted by SwalePie View Post
    Sadly the USA is not a member of the ICC.

    "The US is not a state party to the Rome Statute. The US participated in the negotiations that led to the creation of the court. However, in 1998 the US was one of only seven countries - along with China, Iraq, Israel, Libya, Qatar, and Yemen - that voted against the Rome Statute."
    Many believe that the ICC is a just a self-fulfilling entity. Seriously, what good does it do? It's another one of those 'one world' ideas that seemed a good idea in the late 1980s and early 1990s because of wars that were happening around the world, but very few of those that they charge and convict get taken into custody.

    They had a bit of success with the Yugoslavian conflict and I believe that was about it.

    More wasted taxpayer money to fund those on the gravy train.

Page 28 of 126 FirstFirst ... 1826272829303878 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •