If I was pushed I would say that it needs a 2 state solution.
So - by what authority can he do this? Seems that it is flying in the face of international law.
I thought that the International Criminal Court had issued an arrest warrant.
'The Chamber issued warrants of arrest for two individuals, Mr Benjamin Netanyahu and Mr Yoav Gallant, for crimes against humanity and war crimes committed from at least 8 October 2023 until at least 20 May 2024'
Not worth the paper it is written on, or Trump ignoring it?
The US aren't signed up to the ICC, so they argue it has no jurisdiction in the US. They would also claim the same if Trump was to go ahead with this and would not recognise the legitimacy of the court. As US President he is immune from prosecution in the US itself, so he can do this outside international law without any fear of legal repercussions. International Relations would be in tatters though.
Firstly, thank you for your constructive post.
For a living I get paid to go into businesses that are decent businesses, but are failing in some way. The first question I ask is "why do you do it that way?" Nearly always the answer is because they've always done it like that.
If you keep doing something the same way and keep getting the same result, why should you be surprised?
Neither of us know what Trump's plans really are, but anything is worth a try. Seriously what country in the Middle East is Utopian?
As for the International Court, well they are there to amuse themselves and if they charged every politician when they commit an act that causes multiple deaths, there would be no politicians left to lead.
The IC is nothing more than a political gravy train, like the UN. I mean, why didn't they charge President Biden for his actions in Afghanistan that led to the deaths of 13 American soldiers and an unknown number of Afghanis?