Quote Originally Posted by KerrAvon View Post
So you say it's only a possibility and then get cross about it again.... Isn't that a bit of a waste of nervous energy?

I agree that an ISA limit of 20, 000 p.a. is not a super rich thing, but it's beyond the reach of many people as is the 4,000 p.a. limit that us being talked about for cash ISAs.

The move wouldn't generate any additional government revenue if investors invested their 'extra' 16k in stocks and shares ISAs after putting 4k in a cash ISA. The idea isn't about government revenue- its about putting the money to work by investing in businesses.
How can you tell I?m cross Kerr ? 😁 I know you are intelligent but psychic ability surely not. I?m just writing an opinion like you so are you cross?
The interesting part in your response is it?s beyond the reach of many people. Spoken like a true left wing advocate. Why should the ones who can afford something that you agree aren?t for the super rich suffer. Where is the incentive to work towards that?
Penalising people who may have worked incredibly hard to reach that goal for me just doesn?t make sense. It?s a fundamental ingrained desire of the left of no you can?t have that it?s a resentment in my humble opinion.