Quote Originally Posted by legs77 View Post
Correct and they did say we can only spend what we earn from day one and we need to be sustainable for the long term future of the club.
Did they? Sustainable does not necessarily mean profitable, it does mean affordable. You're not making money on the beer you drink but you still buy it.

I think Old Pie is correct it?s not technically a debt as I believe Ray Trew who was an accountant by trade used similar language on here and the media.
That's not what I said. I said it's not a debt that has to be serviced. The club owes the Bros. The concept is easier to understand if you treat the club as an entitiy in its own right, which as a limited company, it is. The Bros cannot call in the debt from the club as for instance a bank could, or some third party lender. From everything they have so far done they are not desperate to reduce it but they will not be held to ransom and they will take profit where there is good value in so doing.

Back on topic though we got a good deal for a player who had 6 months left and wanted to go the only losers so far are MK Dons as they haven?t won a game since he joined !
Absolutely. They are neither daft nor desperate. A great position to be when carrying out dealings.