
Originally Posted by
UlleyMiller
It's worth investing in a set-up for the young men who fall out of the 'elite' academies at an older age (16 as a minimum) but any younger is little more than a poor mirror of legitimate set-ups. There are obviously a lot of young men who (along with their families) have made a lot of sacrifices to get to the latter stages of larger academies, and in that number will be decent prospects for our level. Scouting professionals these days is a much easier job than pre-internet/data/stat tracking days, so if we're spending as much in that area today it's wasted. Focus on a 'second chance' set-up in a streamlined version of an academy, and get the better prospects around the first team at the earliest opportunity - the best of them will adapt and learn quickly if given the right exposure.