So two examples of companies doing what Trump and I think every American would hope to do - exand their industries to cover the gaps on commodities they will lose through importing. I can understand the idea, and even wish them well for it to work.
But are you not a little troubled by the sheer number of economists, both from the right as well as left, who are predicting that whilst there may be some significant expansion in US home production, it will not mitigate the extra costs that the country, and its workers will have to pay to cover the changes:
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com...2.cms?from=mdr
https://thehill.com/business/5230405...nomic-effects/
And even our very own voice of the libtard sheeple, The Daily Mail:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ans-money.html
From trying to look at Trump's arguments for his tariffs, and the what seems to be a quite unified expectation from economists that this will cost the US worker an awful lot of money, this reminds me of Truss's own 6th form justification of extreme tax cuts leading to immediate growth and trickle down benefits to the UK worksforce.
It will be interesting to see how it pans out. If it does pan out as very few economists predict and the US quickly expands it's industries to cover all of the production needs and somehow manages to provide it's products at similar prices for the consumption by US familiies, with products made by an expanded US worksforce, in turn receiving better pay, I would be very pleased for them, and would look to see how we could replicate elements of this for ourselves. But can such a huge number of economists, of all shades, really be reading it so wrong? I guess if you can immediately dismiss them by saying that they are all in the pay of liberal globalists elite, then I guess you can feel a bit easier with it, but only time will tell. Probably not much time either.
Anybody for lettuce?