Maynard out?

[matt_magpie]

I think last year Maynard was saved because the squad wasn't up to scratch, hence the bizarre Montague statement saying Williams was lucky and Maynard was unlucky. This year he has no such arguments and no Montague to protect him which is the main aspect here. The brothers don't like chopping and changing but they are driven by data and the data does not look good. In a very weak League 2, we failed to achieve the goal of automatic promotion and limped into the playoffs with fans not happy with performances. How many shots on target did we have yesterday? When was our first shot on target? This isn't a unique event either, this will be his undoing

The weird thing is whatever you say about SM and the team they were creating a lot of chances and the xg data supported that but in recent weeks and especially at home it?s just totally dried up, we look absolutely toothless.

We?re too weak in the 10s, there?s bits I like about Grant but he offers no goal/assist threat, whittakers not ready and we?re still weak at wb with JJ not fully fit.
On SM I just don?t know why we didn?t throw the kitchen sink at them from minute one. If we had lost 6-0 I would have took that more than passively loosing 2-1 and passive would be the word I would use to describe this team and the manager.

[forwardmagpie]

I sat through to the end of all the crap mangers we have had, even Steve Thompson. But yesterday I didn?t watch to the end and didn?t really care when I saw Jatta had scored.

The home games have been a really difficult watch and I can?t see that changing with Mr Maynard. I understand the brothers want to play possession based football but surely we to play positive possession based football and not the slow crawl side to side we are currently playing.

I don?t think Mr Maynard is capable of changing this way of playing so I believe we have to make a change (after the play offs of course however that ends) not to the basic plan but how we implement it in order to achieve more consistent results especially at home.

[Shropshire_Pie]

Here's the thing. The club model depends on bringing in players with potential for the coaches to improve so we can progress up the league or sell on. The head coach will go if and when the Bros don't see this happening.

[MagpieMeltdown]

I have just realised we are on 3 home defeats on the bounce.

What was the home defeats in a row record he tried so hard to beat last season. I think it was 5.

A defeat in the home leg next week coupled with more negligence from the owners could see him equal the record twice in 18 months on opening day next season!

Yet still some defend him.

Utterly incomprehensible.

[upthemaggies]

What was the home defeats in a row record he tried so hard to beat last season. I think it was 5.

.

Yes 5, he equalled the club record.

[marky]

Yes 5, he equalled the club record.

He's already half way to breaking that record.

[LeftPeg_Pie]

Youve used a lot of words to come to the conclusion that you think he might,possibly,maybe,potentially if it wasn't for all factors outside his control ok or at best an alright coach. Wakey f******wakey!!!!! He is f***ing clueless!!!!!!!

No, my point is that Maynard is a good coach but there has been a disconnect in the back end of the season. SM has contributed to some of that, but some contributing factors that have been totally out of his control.

I think the biggest thing he needs is an outside voice or two, the kind of figures that might give him a different perspective on a few things to support him.

I can see and understand the sensible arguments from both sides, but Im not buying into the clueless and worst manager ever stuff.

[durhampie]

No, my point is that Maynard is a good coach but there has been a disconnect in the back end of the season. SM has contributed to some of that, but some contributing factors that have been totally out of his control.

I think the biggest thing he needs is an outside voice or two, the kind of figures that might give him a different perspective on a few things to support him.

I can see and understand the sensible arguments from both sides, but Im not buying into the clueless and worst manager ever stuff.

What have you seen that makes him a good coach ? A good coach is pro-active, and always looking for ways to improve results. We dont have, or have not seen any of those qualities with Maynard.. Perhaps you have arrived at your conclusion by listening to his after match reports. Only those who are gullible would believe that bullsh*t

[LeftPeg_Pie]

What have you seen that makes him a good coach ? A good coach is pro-active, and always looking for ways to improve results. We dont have, or have not seen any of those qualities with Maynard.. Perhaps you have arrived at your conclusion by listening to his after match reports. Only those who are gullible would believe that bullsh*t

Like I said in my previous, longer post, I like Maynards underlying approach; dominate the ball home and away. We have generally defended well this season and we generally create a fair amount of chances per game. You do not throw that together. Thats coached. Without raking through the stats, I am more than happy to call Maynard a good coach.

Of course we have been utter toilet in some games, but a fair chunk of games you would put down as ?if we take our chance we win that.?

No doubt we have dropped off in the last three months, especially at home. Clearly, he has room to improve and things to learn. Yesterday was thoroughly disappointing, but Whitaker being outmuscled and Jones pulling out of a tackle cost us both goals.

Maynard is not Pep, but he also is not the worst appointment in football history. He has spent half a season with a depleted backroom staff and one of his most creative forces was not adequately replaced.

I think a voice or two from outside the Radar bubble would do him the world of good.

[durhampie]

Like I said in my previous, longer post, I like Maynards underlying approach; dominate the ball home and away. We have generally defended well this season and we generally create a fair amount of chances per game. You do not throw that together. Thats coached. Without raking through the stats, I am more than happy to call Maynard a good coach.

Of course we have been utter toilet in some games, but a fair chunk of games you would put down as ?if we take our chance we win that.?

No doubt we have dropped off in the last three months, especially at home. Clearly, he has room to improve and things to learn. Yesterday was thoroughly disappointing, but Whitaker being outmuscled and Jones pulling out of a tackle cost us both goals.

Maynard is not Pep, but he also is not the worst appointment in football history. He has spent half a season with a depleted backroom staff and one of his most creative forces was not adequately replaced.

I think a voice or two from outside the Radar bubble would do him the world of good.

A good coach does not lose 14 games at home in 18 months... As for dominating games at home, It says it all when we have 70% possession with just 2 or 3 shots on goal.. Thats been the trend all season. A good coach would have identified the problem and done something about it. Not us, he just blurts on about the players hurting bla bla bla.