Maynard GONE [Official]

[the_anticlough]

The recruitment was frankly awful in Jan and everybody knows it and not one of the signings started the home game against Wimbledon that is telling regardless of what I/we think of Maynard those players were nowhere near good enough and that isn?t on the head coach either.

Austin over Jarvis (twice!) was termination-worthy just by itself

[legs77]

Austin over Jarvis (twice!) was termination-worthy just by itself

Not really Jarvis is talented but hasn?t shown any consistency since being here either you?re making out he has dropped prime John Barnes for Austin.

As I said the window in Jan was sh*t you might think differently.

[Elite_Pie]

Not really Jarvis is talented but hasn?t shown any consistency since being here either you?re making out he has dropped prime John Barnes for Austin.

I read it as saying that since he came back from injury Austin has offered next to nothing, while Jarvis has looked a genuine threat at times.

[Mapperleypie]

I read it as saying that since he came back from injury Austin has offered next to nothing, while Jarvis has looked a genuine threat at times.

I think the owners certainly look at whether the head coach can get the best out of the talent they sign.

SM seemed not to know how to do that and neither did NA - the only two that have been let go by the brothers.

The model is to sign potential and have them be coached to be better to serve the club whilst they are here and potentially demand a transfer fee to better the position of the club as whole.

Out of the 3 head coaches that have been brought in under their ownership 2 have gone to clubs in a higher league for compensation. It?s a pretty decent track record that deserves respect IMO.