Sound Familiar - Other Forum

[baggieal]

Bomber was completely right about it starting on the other forum Boingy totally disagrees with this poster who I know and again - this person goes to the games and knows his footie.

No it?s not just about fkin stats it?s being knowledgeable with football which then should be a sensible debate. Mason got his selection wrong on Friday - we had no pace and no cutting edge. Possession means sweet f uck all. Almost everyone at the match would agree with the above even if opinions differed on the odd player which is normal.

This makes me laugh and so true what Bomber said about it starting:

I have to disagree Boingy I?m afraid ?. Mason came from the same background as Davies at the Blues - they were both on the coaching staff at Spurs I believe? I caught the 2nd half of the Blues v Swansea game and unlike Mason (last night as an example but other times too) Davies made 3 subs on 65 mins and then further subs near the end, one of whom scored their winner. Mason for me is over cautious ? I would have liked to see him throw on Maja earlier up top with Heggebo, we certainly looked more dangerous when he came on ? As I?ve commented elsewhere I think Mason got his selection wrong again last night ? I can see Collyer returning early to Man Ure and when are Gilchrist & Taylor going to start as they are both recognised full backs whereas Campbell and Styles aren?t ? just my opinion ?.

[On Balance]

Bomber was completely right about it starting on the other forum Boingy totally disagrees with this poster who I know and again - this person goes to the games and knows his footie.

No it?s not just about fkin stats it?s being knowledgeable with football which then should be a sensible debate. Mason got his selection wrong on Friday - we had no pace and no cutting edge. Possession means sweet f uck all. Almost everyone at the match would agree with the above even if opinions differed on the odd player which is normal.

This makes me laugh and so true what Bomber said about it starting:

I have to disagree Boingy I?m afraid ?. Mason came from the same background as Davies at the Blues - they were both on the coaching staff at Spurs I believe? I caught the 2nd half of the Blues v Swansea game and unlike Mason (last night as an example but other times too) Davies made 3 subs on 65 mins and then further subs near the end, one of whom scored their winner. Mason for me is over cautious ? I would have liked to see him throw on Maja earlier up top with Heggebo, we certainly looked more dangerous when he came on ? As I?ve commented elsewhere I think Mason got his selection wrong again last night ? I can see Collyer returning early to Man Ure and when are Gilchrist & Taylor going to start as they are both recognised full backs whereas Campbell and Styles aren?t ? just my opinion ?.

And to put the true prospective on a rather slanted post, here is Boingy?s response to the above post.


Boingy

?Thats ok John. We all see things differently.? �� (thumbs up)

No malice there.

[baggieal]

And to put the true prospective on a rather slanted post, here is Boingy?s response to the above post.


Boingy

?Thats ok John. We all see things differently.? �� (thumbs up)

No malice there.

Don?t twist things with a snippet as here?s a bit more. But no malice but just like a broken record - all correctly mentioned by Bomber who left the forum because of your rude and poor comments.



JohnP53
3d
Boingy for me he?s got the full back positions wrong ? Styles was poor tonight and Campbell isn?t a full back either! Start with Gilchrist and Taylor and play Styles in the middle of the park with Collyer and Mikey who both did well when they came on! Mason also needs to play Maja, we just looked far more dangerous when he came on ?



YorkieBaggie
3d
Hi guys, watched yesterday in frustration overall.

I agree on positioning being wrong. Not sure why ajed gets in the team ahead of Mikey or even Iling Junior, feel like we need some pace and youth on the wings. Was he playing Price on the left wing? Again should be more central perhaps as a free roaming no 10 role.

In general we weren?t bad but it is so hard to watch when we decide to make 10 passes instead of 3, with it then going backwards, sideways but hardly in the oppositions box.

I would consider dropping Mowatt, Mulumby and replace wirh Styles and Collyer.

So:

GK Griffiths

RB Gilchrist

LB Taylor

CB Mepham

CB Phillips (C)

RW Johnston

LW Iling Jnr

CM Collyer

CM Styles

AM Price

CF Maja/Huggebo

Anyway, we know what will happen? we will end uo wirh the same 11 and Man United will recall Colllyer and then send him somewhere else to. Get player of the season!

All observations made by Bomber although every poster will see the odd player differently how they performed.

In usual boring fashion Boing replied not having it:

Hard luck lads, we won?t lose too many matches playing this well, and never giving up..

What complete utter s hite and certainly was not the reaction of those who have travelled for six hours to get there. Possession means nothing - we had no pace - no cutting edge and the team selection was wrong. That?s different to differing views on the odd player or how the odd player performs.


Bomber is 100% correct and the guy has been on this board for years and you have made him
leave like you did with Mick - calling him immature and communicating like an headmaster to a school kid.

Smart Alec is what you are! Move over to the other forum and hopefully Bomber will return as many love his match predictions. But hey you won?t because you want to spoil it for the rest!

[On Balance]

The

Don?t twist things with a snippet as here?s a bit more. But no malice but just like a broken record - all correctly mentioned by Bomber who left the forum because of your rude and poor comments.



JohnP53
3d
Boingy for me he?s got the full back positions wrong ? Styles was poor tonight and Campbell isn?t a full back either! Start with Gilchrist and Taylor and play Styles in the middle of the park with Collyer and Mikey who both did well when they came on! Mason also needs to play Maja, we just looked far more dangerous when he came on ?



YorkieBaggie
3d
Hi guys, watched yesterday in frustration overall.

I agree on positioning being wrong. Not sure why ajed gets in the team ahead of Mikey or even Iling Junior, feel like we need some pace and youth on the wings. Was he playing Price on the left wing? Again should be more central perhaps as a free roaming no 10 role.

In general we weren?t bad but it is so hard to watch when we decide to make 10 passes instead of 3, with it then going backwards, sideways but hardly in the oppositions box.

I would consider dropping Mowatt, Mulumby and replace wirh Styles and Collyer.

So:

GK Griffiths

RB Gilchrist

LB Taylor

CB Mepham

CB Phillips (C)

RW Johnston

LW Iling Jnr

CM Collyer

CM Styles

AM Price

CF Maja/Huggebo

Anyway, we know what will happen? we will end uo wirh the same 11 and Man United will recall Colllyer and then send him somewhere else to. Get player of the season!

All observations made by Bomber although every poster will see the odd player differently how they performed.

In usual boring fashion Boing replied not having it:

Hard luck lads, we won?t lose too many matches playing this well, and never giving up..

What complete utter s hite and certainly was not the reaction of those who have travelled for six hours to get there. Possession means nothing - we had no pace - no cutting edge and the team selection was wrong. That?s different to differing views on the odd player or how the odd player performs.


Bomber is 100% correct and the guy has been on this board for years and you have made him
leave like you did with Mick - calling him immature and communicating like an headmaster to a school kid.

Smart Alec is what you are! Move over to the other forum and hopefully Bomber will return as many love his match predictions. But hey you won?t because you want to spoil it for the rest!

And you are off again Al. Making up lie after lie and never providing any evidence to back it up. You love sticking the knife into a person who is not on this site anymore because of you.

Out of interest the link below will provide evidence (which you never) that there was no malice in Boingy?s or any other posters post on the other site.

It was you who selected one post and I selected Boingy?s answer. You then, lying as usual, try to make it me that only showed one post.

Read the whole thing and you will see it is all banter done in the best possible taste. The truth is in the link below.

https://baggiesforum.co.uk/t/tough-g...road-v-boro/41

You twist and lie to make things fit your agenda.

You lied about Mickd removing the Huw Edward’s Post and I can prove it.

I will not be bullied into leaving this forum, not by you or any other playground bully.


Like you keep repeating, bullies should be stood up to. Well Al I am standing up to a bully, and I am sure you can work out who the bully is.

[Albionic68]

Aha. I was about to say this place must be one of fear and trepidation where only fools would dare to tread as online angels would be afraid to given the amount of bullying old men residing here.

And then you go and edit your post to point a whirly finger at one poster in particular. On Balance I would have say you have lightened my day. For the life of me I couldn't work out what I was supposed to have done wrong with a certain former poster.

Well that's not entirely true because I haven't given it a moment's thought as I know damn well I did nothing wrong beyond delving deeper into stats to offer alternative views along with the occasional tongue in cheek comment.

He's playing nicely at the moment but it won't be too long before he starts to fray at the edges. I can post that without fear of an accusation of online bullying as he won't have read this post. And if he has all I can say is those who seek offence are capable of finding it wherever they choose to look 😎.

[On Balance]

Aha. I was about to say this place must be one of fear and trepidation where only fools would dare to tread as online angels would be afraid to given the amount of bullying old men residing here.

And then you go and edit your post to point a whirly finger at one poster in particular. On Balance I would have say you have lightened my day. For the life of me I couldn't work out what I was supposed to have done wrong with a certain former poster.

Well that's not entirely true because I haven't given it a moment's thought as I know damn well I did nothing wrong beyond delving deeper into stats to offer alternative views along with the occasional tongue in cheek comment.

He's playing nicely at the moment but it won't be too long before he starts to fray at the edges. I can post that without fear of an accusation of online bullying as he won't have read this post. And if he has all I can say is those who seek offence are capable of finding it wherever they choose to look ��.

I enjoy your wisdom 68.

You can always shine a light and show an alternative dimension to a situation.

[Albionic68]

I enjoy your wisdom 68.......

Said nobody ever in real life, especially not my wife 😃 😀 😄. Cheers all the same OB, have a cracking day chap 😎.

[On Balance]

I have thought long and hard since Tuesday past as to whether or not to post this. After a lot of consideration I have decided that after, over a period of two years of a poster posting defamatory remarks and false statements regarding my personality and ***uality.

I make no apologies for posting this three times. Once on the two posts that refer to this post and a third in its own right. It is a quite a long read taking into account the evidence attached.

I will show that what was said about me by Baggieal was untrue and all lies.

I am not asking anyone to take sides. Just that you read it in full, including the links and then make up your own mind on whether there is truth or untruths in what was said about me in posts I have made.

Baggie Al stated, and I quote.

“What you put on that Huw Edwards post was absolutely vile and you it was personal with reference to Mick?s company which was outrageous. That was why he deleted the complete thread and had enough.”[Sic]

And again.

“OB has an agenda and it was Mick who deleted the Huw Edwards thread as personal comments were made on their in addition to his company.”[Sic]


So here is the proof. The link below is of Mickd’s thread regarding Huw Edward’s dated 8th July 2023. If you read through the thread you will see I did not make any offensive comments directed at Mickd or any other poster.

https://boards.footymad.net/showthread.php?t=38307643

The next link is a further thread Mick made regarding Huw Edward’s dated 11th July 2023. Again if you read through it you will see I have not made any offensive comments directed at Mick or any other poster.

https://boards.footymad.net/showthread.php?t=38307749



The third link below will show that Mick became a moderator after 3rd August 2023, therefore he would not have been able to remove threads at least up until that date, and as there was no issues with those threads why would he remove them.

https://boards.footymad.net/showthread.php?t=38308590

Mickd’s last post was made on the 15th October 2024 on the thread to which the below link is attributed to. The link is regarding the fat jab. I will let you make up your own minds on that one. Maybe it was banter but it was his last post to date. Even friends do fall out occasionally.

https://boards.footymad.net/showthread.php?t=38328315

The point I make is that Baggie Al has made up many untruths to back up his points. Make up is, the prerogative word, because nine times out of ten it is all untruths that he attempts to pass off as truths. Untruths about posters character, posters ***uality, posters personal life and untruths about what they have posted.

The comment he made suggesting I have divulged private information regarding Mick’s business, is a statement that is just simply not true, and made without foundation whatsoever.

Al has often called me offensive names, even stooping so low as to call me a dogs turd and call me gay. He has used the F word and the C word to describing me. I have never retaliated to his abuse.

I have an absolute dislike of bullies and in my line of work I see plenty. It is my job, my business to ensure total fairness. I will stand up to any bully and I stood next to Boingy because he was subject to abuse behind his back. Why anyone would continue to berate him when he had left this forum is beyond me I cannot see it serves any other purpose.

I could go on but I think any fair minded and level headed person will see it for themselves if they look at the whole situation as posted here.

I can only leave up to individuals to make up their own minds. I do not bully people, I simply stand up to them. I have asked Baggieal time and time and time again, that he provides evidence to support the untruths he has posted about me over the two and three quarter years since I joined this site. He has have been unable to do so and therefore the question begs why?

As I said in the beginning of this post, I am not asking anyone to take sides. Just to read it in full, including the links and then make up your own mind on whether there is truth or untruths in what was said about me in posts I have made, and perhaps have some understanding of why I found it so unjust and discriminatory, for those untruths to go unchecked.

I will leave you with two questions.

Would you stand with a bully or stand up to them?

Would you stand by a bully because they were popular and your friend or would stand up to them?

I know where I stand.

Thanks you if you have taken the time to read it. I do fully understand that it is quite a bit to take in.

[kettering_baggie]

Is every thread degenerating into a war of words; surely a discussion can be had between fellow Baggies without the use of insults?