
Originally Posted by
ragingpup
You're talking legal migration?
There are 2 angles to this re health care.
1. Our health and social care services have been hugely propped up by immigrants coming in specifically in the last few years to fill these so called low to mid skilled jobs as we couldn't fill them domestically (low wage and low status vs long hours and very demanding work in care sector). So the first thing you'd have to say regarding migration impacting health care is surely it's a god send? I'm sure we'd all prefer the jobs to be higher wage and status so that they could be filled by domestic work force but we're simply not prepared to vote for politicians that prioritise higher funding of these sectors.
2. Looking carefully at the reports I linked you to, it looks on balance that the majority of migrants, most notably in the mid to higher skills sectors bring in a positive surplus when migrated to domestic work force (who are going through schools and colleges before contributing to the economy. And obviously the contributions through skills, taxes and spending goes towards the economy including funding health sectors.
That's not too deny that lower skills and historic migrants that have fallen on benefits (or only ever known benefits) aren't a drain. Of course they are. But on balance, economy wise, the positive contributions (in my opinion, seeing as we are not willing to fund domestic upscaling to meet these essential services) outweigh the negatives.