Election Year or Fear!

[ramAnag]

According to IPSO statistics, NO. But according to Swaleconomia YES, corroborated naturally by rA. However neither has provided any credible evidence of this. It may be true but it could be fabrication or regurgitated from online "sources". I actually don't know. I did ask Swale for source of the 100 and was referred to IPSO which clearly wasn't the source. I too would like to see evidence as opposed to heresay/anecdotal .....

The difficulty in getting at truth of the matter may well be retractions/corrections that never resulted in formal complaints and were settled "out of court". In which case I doubt there is any record short of some nerd trawling through all back copies

Nothing to do with me agreeing with Swale, although I unapologetically do on this matter. All to do with your apparent reluctance/inability to differentiate between corrections and upheld complaints. Google it!

[Geoff Parkstone]

There you go MA - Google it

[ramAnag]

There you go MA - Google it

Well, if you searched just a little bit - instead of making pointless personal attacks - you’d discover that the DT made 80 clarifications and corrections between the beginning of this year and 5/11/25. You’ll find all the details if you bother to look. Kind of challenges their credibility in terms of attacking the BBC - who I think (not certain) - made 33.

[Andy_Faber]

Sorry I'm a little confused here, is it The Daily Telegraph of the BBC that's being sued by Trump for £1bn of public funds?

[MadAmster]

Sorry I'm a little confused here, is it The Daily Telegraph of the BBC that's being sued by Trump for £1bn of public funds?

It's the BBC. However, it's the Telegraph that is having a go at the BBC for the editing of the Trump word salad when they themselves have published more than 100 corrections...

Pot, Kettle, Black.

[ramAnag]

Sorry I'm a little confused here, is it The Daily Telegraph of the BBC that's being sued by Trump for £1bn of public funds?

Neither. Although, as I’m sure you’re fully aware, it’s the BBC that Trump is THREATENING to sue. Then again he makes lots of threats.

Personally I wish he, and many other politicians of various persuasions, would get on with the business of improving peoples’ lives rather than emulating a very poor soap opera with a cast full of narcissists.

[Andy_Faber]

Neither. Although, as I?m sure you?re fully aware, it?s the BBC that Trump is THREATENING to sue. Then again he makes lots of threats.

Personally I wish he, and many other politicians of various persuasions, would get on with the business of improving peoples? lives rather than emulating a very poor soap opera with a cast full of narcissists.

Agreed, including the most recent fubar emanating from Number 10

[ramAnag]

Agreed, including the most recent fubar emanating from Number 10

No argument from me, but when you have the POTUS constantly attacking the media and filing numerous court cases, Labour squabbling between themselves and two of the opposition parties doing nothing other than constantly trying to discredit and undermine the Government there seems to be little hope.

[Andy_Faber]

No argument from me, but when you have the POTUS constantly attacking the media and filing numerous court cases, Labour squabbling between themselves and two of the opposition parties doing nothing other than constantly trying to discredit and undermine the Government there seems to be little hope.

If, as some (including me to some extent) think, ?dark forces? are inciting the unrest, they are doing a bloody good job.

[Geoff Parkstone]

No argument from me, but when you have the POTUS constantly attacking the media and filing numerous court cases, Labour squabbling between themselves and two of the opposition parties doing nothing other than constantly trying to discredit and undermine the Government there seems to be little hope.

I'm not sure I can remember a time when opposition parties were not constantly trying to discredit and undermine the Government. It's sort of their job isn't it