The last thing I want is for Johnson and his henchmen taking us out of the EU however the Labour Party seem reluctant to carry out the result of the referendum so I won't be voting for anybody .
For my vote to have any value personally the Labour Party would have to win this election and take us out of the EU , both examples seem unlikely .
I don't think I'll be better off personally over the next few years but remaining in the EU won't guarantee me anything either in fact as of last week the animal household will be 3k a year worse off due to my partner having her hours cut back by Barnsley council .
However at least in the decades to come the UK electorate will have the opportunity to shape whatever economic policy they choose without the permanent neoliberal monkey from Brussels on their backs .
I’m not sure it completely depends on where labour got there info from if it was from reddit then yes I do since the info that was posted on Reddit this already been proven to be posted by a Russian cyber group. If labour got it from somewhere else And can prove it then no I won’t believe it. At min it’s very fishy and suspicious but I have my doubts I admit since even in documents there’s no evidence that nhs will be sold off or that we will even consider it. If it was really made by Russians wouldn’t it say something that would leave no doubt that Tory’s would sell nhs off?
And no I didn’t believe the 2017 Russian claim since all it was was a allegation by a retard remoaner mp with No Shred of evidence and the day I believe a word a mp says is the day hell freezes over.
Ether way evidence puppy is what I’m looking for not some Mp fool waving paper saying what’s in it, when it could be a Russian bible for all we know
Last edited by Silly-miller; 07-12-2019 at 02:00 PM.
It's daft to believe any "leaked" document unless the source is verified.
According to the leaked document I've seen Paul Warne has been approached to be the new boss of real Madrid
No all I’m saying is corbyns coming out with a piece of paper that he says is hard evidence but anyone who’s read it from press says it says nothing to prove corbyns claims and the fact is corbyn won’t say where he got it from. All I’m saying is it’s suspicious and the only good that paper is good for is wiping grists ass (that’s if it’s absorbent enough) lol
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.b...mp/uk-50699168
Make of this what you want puppy
But il go back to my original statement
whatever next
Interesting ......
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...k-transparency