Did The Rangers receive favourable terms from the SFA

[DeezAreGood]

their phoenix club is not a continuation of the original gretna which is why the situation is different to hearts, coventry leeds, rangers, hibs and about 15 other clubs - its not rocket science, its been explained to you numerous times, this is the offical position accepted by everyone credible yet you still insist in talking pysh

which one of those clubs was not allowed to continue in the same league, and therefore isn't a valid comparison? you'd really think you'd give it a rest, after the nomad farce which you absolutely phukked up big style :/

[super_ally_rfc]

Aberdeen have twice qualified for a relegation play-off. One of which they won, and the other which did not happen, for (daft) reasons that were in the rulebook and known to all before the season started.

They have never been in an automatic relegation spot.


When Gretna were liquidated they went out of league football completely - their phoenix club, with a new, was let back into South of Scotland set up that became the Lowland League - not directly into the SPFL.

their phoenix club is not a continuation of the original gretna which is why the situation is different to hearts, coventry leeds, rangers, hibs and about 15 other clubs - its not rocket science, its been explained to you numerous times, this is the offical position accepted by everyone credible yet you still insist in talking pysh[/quote]
Those other clubs mentioned

[super_ally_rfc]

their phoenix club is not a continuation of the original gretna which is why the situation is different to hearts, coventry leeds, rangers, hibs and about 15 other clubs - its not rocket science, its been explained to you numerous times, this is the offical position accepted by everyone credible yet you still insist in talking pysh

which one of those clubs was not allowed to continue in the same league, and therefore isn't a valid comparison? you'd really think you'd give it a rest, after the nomad farce which you absolutely phukked up big style :/[/quote]

what nomad farce would that be? making up ***** as usual with no evidence deez no surprise there !
as for your bit about the club not being able to continue in the same league, - any proof of that - nope again, an argument amde up in your own silly wee head with no evidence backing it up to try and flim flam your way out of t

[DeezAreGood]

Confirmation that daft erse has totally lost it, he's now denying Rangers Ltd went into liquidation at all, denying that Rangers have actually been playing in the diddy leagues for 3 yeare and apparently a nomad was appointed and the share issue to save Sevco will happen soon and all the reports are wrong. Embarrassing stuff :/

[CoveKreep]

Even the mouthpiece of the former rangers confirmed it.





Trying to play an Iraqi info-minister style media game of pretendy-otherwise doesn't cut it with your knowledgeable Scottish football fans.

[AguyIknow]

Sevconians going on about others being "phoenix clubs" but trying to pretend Rangers never died and continues on


OMHS

[super_ally_rfc]

Even the mouthpiece of the former rangers confirmed it.





Trying to play an Iraqi info-minister style media game of pretendy-otherwise doesn't cut it with your knowledgeable Scottish football fans.

ahem!



the only iraqi info minister style pysh is coming from you, everyone credible says we are the same club and there a 20 other clubs who went through the same process as us and are still the same club - yet you still deny it

[super_ally_rfc]

Confirmation that daft erse has totally lost it, he's now denying Rangers Ltd went into liquidation at all, denying that Rangers have actually been playing in the diddy leagues for 3 yeare and apparently a nomad was appointed and the share issue to save Sevco will happen soon and all the reports are wrong. Embarrassing stuff :/

rangers didnt go into liquidation the holding company did - according to everyone credible

where did i deny rangers have been in the lower leagues for 3 years - answer = i didnt - more pish from you

the share issue doesnt need a nomad to go ahead and will happen soon, we dont really need a nomad so it isnt a fiasco and we are already trading on another exchange


summary - you talk pysh

[super_ally_rfc]

[quote="AguyIknow" but trying to pretend Rangers never died and continues on


OMHS [/quote]

its almost as if everybody says we are the same club and no credible sources apart from a few clueless fuds on a messageboard say otherwise - oh wait thats exactly what happened - laughing at you as usual

[DeezAreGood]

the holding company went into liquidation, oh mah phukkin sides, that's the one that tops the lot

and if you didn't need a nomad, why were you bumping yer gums on here, making a complete erse of yourself in the process.

How many players did Rangers have in June 2012