+ Visit Derby County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Who was responsible for appointing McClaren?

  1. #11

    re: Who was responsible for appointing McClaren?

    Bstand is entitled to his opinion and does have a poing regarding the waste of valuable club funds. However it seems McClaren has been disrespectful to the club and the supporters, possibly costing the club tens of millions in Sky money, the prize for promotion to the PL.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,783

    re: Who was responsible for appointing McClaren?

    Quote Originally Posted by vanderlaans_header
    Bstand is entitled to his opinion and does have a poing regarding the waste of valuable club funds. However it seems McClaren has been disrespectful to the club and the supporters, possibly costing the club tens of millions in Sky money, the prize for promotion to the PL.
    Maybe we should just sack everyone at the club then. The ownership group should go, Rush, Vicars, Evans the whole bleedin lot. We also supported McClaren so perhaps we should look at ourselves and never go again because we got it wrong and wasted our money..
    Jeeez...

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    22,832

    re: Who was responsible for appointing McClaren?

    Quote Originally Posted by swaledale
    It wasn't as if the current situation could have been forseen
    No you mean when people pointed it out you were too blinkered to even acknowledge it and tried to ridicule!

    IMO you are a good example of how situations are perceived to be such a surprise in football when they really are not. You happy clap along refusing to consider anything other than what you want to attacking anyone who dares says anything different. The when it's proven true you try and claim its "just one of those things" every single time.

    As the statement seems to also acknowledge things off the field need to improve and clearly it hasn't been happening there either. That confirms that the situation has now not improved but gone backwards off and on the field.

    Not foreseen ... I told you back in October!

    The problem is those who refused to look and see have allowed the additional time that had probably set the club back an number of years and eroded the g

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,629

    re: Who was responsible for appointing McClaren?

    When clough was sacked and mcclaren appointed , I was happiy. Clough had gone because he had sapped every bit of positive energy I had and had bored me to death. However , given his remit..he did a decent off the field job.
    Iwasnthappy with mcclaren at the time, however all of a sudden the life had come back into my love for the club and good football prevailed.

    This is not a footballing decision...this is because he flirted with Newcastle.
    I am glad the club have made this decision on principle...

    On football reasons ... the future worries me with the uncertainty...he was a good coach after all

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    21,678

    re: Who was responsible for appointing McClaren?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rattea
    It wasn't as if the current situation could have been forseen
    No you mean when people pointed it out you were too blinkered to even acknowledge it and tried to ridicule!

    IMO you are a good example of how situations are perceived to be such a surprise in football when they really are not. You happy clap along refusing to consider anything other than what you want to attacking anyone who dares says anything different. The when it's proven true you try and claim its "just one of those things" every single time.

    As the statement seems to also acknowledge things off the field need to improve and clearly it hasn't been happening there either. That confirms that the situation has now not improved but gone backwards off and on the field.

    Not foreseen ... I told you back in October!

    The problem is those who refused to look and see have allowed the additional time that had probably set the c

  6. #16

    re: Who was responsible for appointing McClaren?

    Quote Originally Posted by AngryRam
    Bstand is entitled to his opinion and does have a poing regarding the waste of valuable club funds. However it seems McClaren has been disrespectful to the club and the supporters, possibly costing the club tens of millions in Sky money, the prize for promotion to the PL.
    Maybe we should just sack everyone at the club then. The ownership group should go, Rush, Vicars, Evans the whole bleedin lot. We also supported McClaren so perhaps we should look at ourselves and never go again because we got it wrong and wasted our money..
    Jeeez...
    [/quote]

    Ridiculous. I was refering to the alleged actions of McClaren possibly costing the club, as far as I am aware the same allegations have not been made about other emloyees at the club.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    1,907

    re: Who was responsible for appointing McClaren?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rattea
    It wasn't as if the current situation could have been forseen
    No you mean when people pointed it out you were too blinkered to even acknowledge it and tried to ridicule!

    IMO you are a good example of how situations are perceived to be such a surprise in football when they really are not. You happy clap along refusing to consider anything other than what you want to attacking anyone who dares says anything different. The when it's proven true you try and claim its "just one of those things" every single time.

    As the statement seems to also acknowledge things off the field need to improve and clearly it hasn't been happening there either. That confirms that the situation has now not improved but gone backwards off and on the field.

    Not foreseen ... I told you back in October!

    The problem is those who refused to look and see have allowed the additional time that had probably set the c

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    368

    re: Who was responsible for appointing McClaren?

    Quote Originally Posted by AngryRam
    So what's the next stage in the master plan? Seems like a shambles to me.


    Why do people always spout up in hindsight.
    Er - bit hard to complain about the sacking before it happened.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    6,775

    re: Who was responsible for appointing McClaren?

    for crying out loud bstand. how many new threads do you need to start saying exactly the same thing?

    yes everybody is entitled to an opinion but surely it comes to a point when it becomes spam.

    who was responsible? rush clearly in my eyes. we've already established in your other threads that it was a good appointment.

    shame the way it's ended. if media reports are to be believed it's more mel morris' decision to let him go.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    7,399

    re: Who was responsible for appointing McClaren?

    Quote Originally Posted by swaledale
    Rush?
    GSE?
    Appleby?
    The Board?
    Two lots of managerial compensation in less than 20 months, you couldn't make it up.
    Those responsible for SM's appointment should worry, rough calculation suggests 50% of the season ticket monies may have gone on compensation for this shambles.
    If I was a lead investor I would want an explanation of why my investment money was being spent like this.

    Watford and Norwich did and seem to have done OK!

    Why criticise the board for making decisive moves when things aren't going well? or are you trying to imply sacking Clough (who has hardly torn up trees up the road ) was an error?

    It wasn't as if the current situation could have been forseen, these things happen and I for one are glad we have a board whoa re decisive, plan successions and act in the interests of getting success at this club.[/quote]



    Wait a week or so and get compo or act 'decisively' and

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •