Will Hughes

[DCFC95]

Hughes just doesn't have the all round game or physical attributes. He plays a
Couple of good balls a game or looks slightly better against weak opposition and some start singing his praises and calling him a world beater. He rarely puts in what can be called a shift and scores only a few. His physical presence is almost none existent. Top players have almost a complete set
If attributes and by this agar are commanding games.

Players like Johnson may not have the pretty little passes so much but they have attributes in more areas. Bryson is brilliant box to box and since he's been returned to this role has made the difference. I would argue he's more important to the team than the likes of keough and Martin. For me the jury is out on Butterfield. He's a fair player but still goes quiet to often.

Okay... well. Firstly, his primary job isn't to dominate games. His job is to pop up in the channels, creating space for the wingers

[swaledale]

Hughes just doesn't have the all round game or physical attributes. He plays a
Couple of good balls a game or looks slightly better against weak opposition and some start singing his praises and calling him a world beater. He rarely puts in what can be called a shift and scores only a few. His physical presence is almost none existent. Top players have almost a complete set
If attributes and by this agar are commanding games.

Players like Johnson may not have the pretty little passes so much but they have attributes in more areas. Bryson is brilliant box to box and since he's been returned to this role has made the difference. I would argue he's more important to the team than the likes of keough and Martin. For me the jury is out on Butterfield. He's a fair player but still goes quiet to often.

Okay... well. Firstly, his primary job isn't to dominate games. His job is to pop up in the

[swaledale]

Is God

[The Bedlington Terrier]

I would like him at Burnley.

[swaledale]

I would like him at Burnley.

He might not be at Derby next season if we **** it up again!

[roger_ramjet]

I would like him at Burnley.

Who? Will Hughes or Ratty? If its the latter I'll drive him there myself

[swaledale]

I would like him at Burnley.

Who? Will Hughes or Ratty? If its the latter I'll drive him there myself[/quote]


Ratty like a bad smell will forever be around, what else would he do with his life but come on DM and demonstrate his unique interpretation of the "facts"?

Anyway the Forum would be less interesting without him, you'd be reduced to having a "debate" with helloloves!!!

[Rattea]

Hughes just doesn't have the all round game or physical attributes. He plays a
Couple of good balls a game or looks slightly better against weak opposition and some start singing his praises and calling him a world beater. He rarely puts in what can be called a shift and scores only a few. His physical presence is almost none existent. Top players have almost a complete set
If attributes and by this agar are commanding games.

Players like Johnson may not have the pretty little passes so much but they have attributes in more areas. Bryson is brilliant box to box and since he's been returned to this role has made the difference. I would argue he's more important to the team than the likes of keough and Martin. For me the jury is out on Butterfield. He's a fair player but still goes quiet to often.

Okay... well. Firstly, his primary job isn't to dominate games. His job is to pop up in the

[triz]

Comparing Hughes to scholes doesn't mean you're saying he's anywhere near as good or ever will be. Its like when I compare myself to thorne, we play similar games and have similar styles of play but the level of ability is clearly very different.

[AdiSalisbury]

He doesn't have a patch on you Triz!