+ Visit Derby County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: WHO is better ? KEOGH or SHACKELL ??

  1. #11

    re: WHO is better ? KEOGH or SHACKELL ??

    Shackell by quite a margin. I'm not convinced Keogh is good enough for the Premier.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    558

    re: WHO is better ? KEOGH or SHACKELL ??

    Quote Originally Posted by roger_ramjet
    The sum of the parts is less than the whole. They compilment each other well.
    That’s synergy for you.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    4,716

    re: WHO is better ? KEOGH or SHACKELL ??

    They play different positions, so not really fair to compare. However, if I had to lose one, I'd rather loose Shackell than Keogh.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    224

    re: WHO is better ? KEOGH or SHACKELL ??

    Quote Originally Posted by AngryRam
    I would have said Shackell by a mile a year ago.....now...I'm not so sure.

    Its a tough call.............as i'm no Keogh fan.......

    BUT Shackell is past his best....and Keogh keeps on keeping on.

    I'm sitting on the fence.

    EVEN STEVEN.
    Shackell is a better defender, reads the game better.
    Keogh is better with the ball but needs a Shackell beside him. Never been a Keogh fan, big heart, yes..
    I guess they kinda worked as a partnership last season.
    Get off the fence, thought you were a Londoner? shacks wins it.
    [/quote]

    Ok - I'll reluctantly go for Shackell.............Keogh without his mistakes I'd prefer.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    944

    re: WHO is better ? KEOGH or SHACKELL ??

    Has Shackell been worth the £3 million you paid us last summer? I am a bit disappointed the Rams did not get promotion as Burnley would havel received "nice little add-ons" rising to £500,000 for Shacks if Derby had made the Premier League next season and managed to avoid relegation....an extra £250,000 for going up and £250,000 for staying up.

    We have a similar agreement with Brentford for Gray.....£6 million up front with an extra £3 million dependent on promotion (achieved), goals scored (achieved), appearances (achieved), PL survival (hopefully) and England caps (possible I suppose).

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    224

    re: WHO is better ? KEOGH or SHACKELL ??

    [quote="lancyclaret" rising to £500,000 for Shacks if Derby had made the Premier League next season and managed to avoid relegation....an extra £250,000 for going up and £250,000 for staying up.

    We have a similar agreement with Brentford for Gray.....£6 million up front with an extra £3 million dependent on promotion (achieved), goals scored (achieved), appearances (achieved), PL survival (hopefully) and England caps (possible I suppose).[/quote]


    NO - not worth it - he was brilliant first time around - seems a bit robotic to me nowadays.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •