
Originally Posted by
wrinkly
West Ham get almost 3 times the average home gate of Burnley and I guess prices would be higher in London.
They get a ridiculously generous deal on the stadium. 2.5 million in rent on a stadium which cost at least 272 million to convert for footy, this includes almost all the running costs of the stadium. Per Kerr - we pay 1.1 million a year rent.
West Ham could pay Dyche a lot more than Burnley could and Dyche may believe he will not be able to sustain his success rate with Burnley