|
| + Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
It's getting more organised.
At first it was the people discontent with the price of fuel and the policy that Macron enforced regarding the fuel prices. He had said that he was going to put 7 centimes on the price of diesel on a certain date when it was already at an all time high. When the jilet jeune protest it was mainly for that reason. Since then we've had strikes at universities and other secondry educational facilities to the extent that the kids came out on strike for 3 days in protest to the reforms to the education system. In secondary education now they can have upto 40 kids in a class and then to a limit 44 until they have to employ another prof.
Last week there were postal strikes and demonstartionst organised by recognised unions. This is the prefered way for Macron because he knows who to speak to. The Jilet Jeunes didn't have a leader and that's what made it so difficult for them to find a resolution. One thing regarding the first jilet jeune demos was that they had police sympathy and informed the police when and where they were protesting and they were controled to some extent in good humour but the jilet jeunes couldn't get anywhere near the facilities that refined the fuel. Those areas were controlled by tougher measures to make sure that the country could run.
There is much more to come from the protests like in the other big cities as this weekend showed. The demos weren't in Paris this weekend but other big cities had them. There isn't a cat in hells chance of Macron getting reelected.
Last edited by frogmiller; 25-03-2019 at 06:10 AM.
Pretty much true. If we leave the EU soon, the conditions we see around us would not get better as the issues around us are caused by our government's choices.
It could be considerably worse however and not just on economic grounds. How will NHS and social care improve with a substantial decrease in care workers? In the desired utopia of substantially less immigrant workers doing jobs lower than the 30k cut off, who will be doing those jobs, in cafes, bars, restaurants, fields, streets etc?
Because we as a nation will decide who we want to allow in [or at least that's how it should work]
What a poor argument when you ask who will be doing these jobs
I think what you mean is how will all those companies be able to get cheap labour [often below min wage] so that the tax payer can supplement their income with benefits thus resulting in the taxpayer subsidising great numbers of these so called "businesses"
No I don't Exile. I mean employers like the NHS and council social services which pay above at or above national minimum wage but are extremely demanding jobs, long hours and are propped up on immigrant workers that will fall below the 30k that the government has set as a mimimum wage for entry (if they go through with that).
Likewise, in the service sector the pay is at minimum wage but is again largely dominated by immigrant workers.
You could argue that in reducing the immigrant workforce here, you will be forcing employers to increase their wages. Is that what you think will happen? With the conservative government?
If you are supporting creating this problem, what do you see as the solution to it?