|
| + Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
This link Says he was drinking.
https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...21466.html?amp
All 3 are as bad as each other. Keogh is the oldest, the most injured and the least valuable.
Derby are a ****ehouse of a club and should’ve either sacked all 3 or kept all 3.
Don’t know if he drank or not but tbh there’s rumours that he stayed to watch the other two but tbh it doesn’t matter he wasn’t driving. It make derby look bad tbh they look like they will over look criminals so long as they can play
I don’t have a police report just know what my dad reads on his fan page and dcfc news
Understandably there's been lots of conjecture following the sacking of Richard Keogh - with many questioning why the club captain has been sacked, yet Mason Bennett and Tom Lawrence have kept their jobs.
It's understood several factors counted against Keogh. He was the club captain, a senior player and it was felt he should have taken more responsibility on the night in question. These reasons, coupled with a serious injury sustained through a non-football activity, are why the club have felt it necessary to terminate Keogh's contract.
We almost certainly haven't heard the last of this, with Keogh expected to appeal against the decision.
I would have thought that all football clubs (inc RUFC) have contract clauses that require players not to undertake activities that can cause injury, ie hang gliding, playing amateur rugby etc. Whilst getting drunk and crashing cars is an extreme example of "putting self at risk" it would probably still let the club punish Keogh in this way.
However, not applying the same rule to their other two players seems to be an indication that there's playing time left in them where Keogh hasn't.
But hey. it's football, all about money not fairness
The free market at work.
I wasn't aware that fully grown men earning what they earn needed a baby sitter.