+ Visit Newcastle United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 81

Thread: James Maddison

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    3,894
    Big Rumour now is Barella for 50m not to sure what to make of that one though.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    4,528
    Want 55 mil apparantly say sly sports.

    If true I say jog on. Put the amount into Barella.

    Leicester cant be for real, one year left on his contract and relegated. No way is Maddison playing a single chimpo game. I think 30-40 is fair market value.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    4,528
    I would however be open a 30million offer plus players deal for a couple of our chimpo level players. We dont need the cash obvs but with FFP in mind and doing the right thing.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    4,528
    Leicester need defenders, well we got one or two of those.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    16,750
    I read it’s 40, going to 55 million. Not sure how it ‘gets’ to 55 million.
    I think you’re right, we should deal hard. He wants to come by all accounts so that’s 70% of the battle won.
    It's not a case of the money for him, as you say, but what we have left in FFP rules to buy other players.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    47,920
    Leicester are desperate to start a bidding war, whereas us and Spuds are very keen to not get into one.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    1,515
    Norwich get 15% fort the sell on fee, Leicester are adding that in.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    4,528
    [QUOTE=Scott Kirkland;40300970]Norwich get 15% fort the sell on fee, Leicester are adding that

    Longer its left the lower the price. Move on.

    I don't think Spurs will spend anywhere near 55 even if they sell Kane snyway.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2022
    Posts
    1,012
    I really want Maddison at the club, however £55 mil seems a lot. £40 mil tops.

    Yes Gordon was £45 and Maddison is currently better, but imo we paid over market value for Gordon and we took a gamble on his potential.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    27,696
    Quote Originally Posted by GBruno View Post
    I really want Maddison at the club, however £55 mil seems a lot. £40 mil tops.

    Yes Gordon was £45 and Maddison is currently better, but imo we paid over market value for Gordon and we took a gamble on his potential.
    Aye, that's a good point about Gordon.

    Plus, Maddison only has a year left and they're in the Chimpo so their bargaining position is a lot weaker than if they'd stayed up.

Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •