“United States of America v Donald J Trump”

[sinkov]

Below is the state of play on both sides of the pond, and it is indeed scary mon ami. Even the Donald, rich and powerful as he is, is being stitched up like a kipper.

"Beginning with the financial crisis of 2008, and accelerating after the collapse of the Occupy Wall Street movement in 2011, the political order of the United States and the entire West entered a period of serious transition. A gradual evolution in the forms and orders of power – underway already for many generations – suddenly accelerated, as the ruling classes took a series of drastic self-conscious steps to consolidate their own ranks and attenuate the political voice of the rabble. Major corporations, academia, the press, and the political establishment set aside their few remaining differences and worked to establish a new impenetrable system of rule. Many former oppositional leftists joined them in this project, after agreeing to exchange their economic critiques for a new programme of identity advocacy. Woke capital, the rise of critical race theory, radical climate policies, escalating mass immigration, and the ascendancy of the rainbow brigade are the dubious fruits of the new regime. Because they arise from the near-total assimilation of the left with the ruling class, anyone who objects to any element of this novel and quite bizarre political programme is now a right-wing extremist."

[sinkov]

When this first kicked off I read a transcript of the Donald speech that was alleged to have called for an insurrection. There was no call for an insurrection, it was quite innocuous, but the blatant lies about what Trump said have continued unabated ever since, and I know they are lies because I read the speech. America is going down the rabbit hole, good luck to them.

"The BBC ?doctored? a Donald Trump speech by making him appear to encourage the Capitol Hill riot, according to an internal whistleblowing memo seen by The Telegraph.

A Panorama programme, broadcast a week before the US election, ?completely misled? viewers by showing the president telling supporters he was going to walk to the Capitol with them to ?fight like hell?, when in fact he said he would walk with them ?to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard?.

The ?mangled? footage was highlighted in a 19-page dossier on BBC bias, which was compiled by a recent member of the corporation?s standards committee and is now circulating in government departments.

The dossier said the programme made the US president ??say? things [he] never actually said? by splicing together footage from the start of his speech with something he said nearly an hour later.

It claimed senior executives and the BBC?s chairman had ignored and dismissed a string of serious complaints raised by the corporation?s own standards watchdog.

Donald Trump Jr, the president?s eldest son, accused the BBC of dishonesty and ?fake news?.

He reposted The Telegraph?s story on X, writing: ?The FAKE NEWS ?reporters? in the UK are just as dishonest and full of s--- as the ones here in America!!!!?

It's over two years now since I pointed out that the BBC was churning out FAKE NEWS, now it's coming to light, but will anything be done about it, or will the great British public have to continue funding the Lefty BBC FAKE NEWS FACTORY ?

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...-donald-trump/

Of course, as usual, there is no mention of this on either the BBC or Grauniad website.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

Funnily enough it is in the Guardian this morning, with a tad of moral outrage to boot.

My problem now mon ami more than ever before is I simply do not trust anything that appears in print.

Unless I see it with my own eyes I refuse to believe it sinkov, and that's why we now have photo-journalism censorship on a grand scale.

[sinkov]

Funnily enough it is in the Guardian this morning, with a tad of moral outrage to boot.

My problem now mon ami more than ever before is I simply do not trust anything that appears in print.

Unless I see it with my own eyes I refuse to believe it sinkov, and that's why we now have photo-journalism censorship on a grand scale.

If it's in the print version of the Grauniad, fair enough, I could find no trace of it on their website.

[ballcock]

Thats what the lefties do Sinkov they make things up and twist the truth

Horrible nasty pheckurs who are out to destroy western societies.
The US is blessed with Trump who stands upto these institutions who want to ravage the West with their perverse ideologies

[army88]

So Mr Trump pleads not guilty to all the charges.

Yet he was filmed by the television companies inciting his supporters to march on the captol Building on the 6th January 2021, with the express intent of trying to force Mike Pence into overturning the declared election result, although at no time did he tell the gun weilding morons to use violence.

While it may have been legal for Mike Pence to overturn the result he chose to standby that election result, which as led to him being classed as a traitor by Trump and his supporters.

At least one of his opponents in the race for republican presidential candidate nomination has intimated that Trump is only seeking re-election as president so he can delay the course of justice, whether that be guily or not guilty. He may even hope to be elected and pardon himself, which is something that could only happen in America.

Personally I can only see the prospect of civil war being if Trump is re-elected and again tries to become a dictator.

Propaganda that vintage - watched a really interesting piece where people within theBBC said they weren't happy re panorama and other s manipulating Trumps speech ( they spliced 2-3 sections to make it look like he insighted violence when in reality he asked for peace and calm.

Find and watch it - the good old BbC selling it to us that Trump did as you intimate.

Tacpayers money - as i say Propaganda.

[The Bedlington Terrier]

If it's in the print version of the Grauniad, fair enough, I could find no trace of it on their website.

Apologies mon ami, I was reading the furore this morning during my breakfast time and I was looking back to send you a copy & paste. It seems I was actually reading a Facebook page not from the Guardian which unsurprisingly is not mentioning the BBC gaffe - deliberate or not. Which ever way me have to expect better from the BBC. Sorry -

[The Bedlington Terrier]

Apologies mon ami, I was reading the furore this morning during my breakfast time and I was just looking back to send you a copy & paste. It seems I was actually reading a Facebook page not from the Guardian, which unsurprisingly is not mentioning the BBC gaffe - deliberate or not. Which ever way we have to expect better from the BBC. Sorry -

[alfinyalcabo]

Phuck off with the politics please 🙏

[army88]

Apologies mon ami, I was reading the furore this morning during my breakfast time and I was just looking back to send you a copy & paste. It seems I was actually reading a Facebook page not from the Guardian, which unsurprisingly is not mentioning the BBC gaffe - deliberate or not. Which ever way we have to expect better from the BBC. Sorry -

Definitely deliberate Bt , signed papers from ex employees highlighting they knew it was wrong several times but the heirachy told them to turn a blind eye and carry on even though they highlighted its illegal and breaks the law.

Tax payers money - the government behind them you really couldn’t write it - like everything else in this country F ——ed dripping with lies and deception to the voters.