+ Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 255 of 412 FirstFirst ... 155205245253254255256257265305355 ... LastLast
Results 2,541 to 2,550 of 4871

Thread: O/T:- ⚠️Impressed with the leadership [The UK Party Politics Thread]

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2021
    Posts
    2,579
    More expected crap replies from the lefties. If you won't watch it how can you form an opinion. The presenters may have their hearts to the right but they have guests on to give the other side of the argument. I would be better off talking to a brick wall I guess.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    24,780
    Quote Originally Posted by Magpies1959 View Post
    More expected crap replies from the lefties. If you won't watch it how can you form an opinion. The presenters may have their hearts to the right but they have guests on to give the other side of the argument. I would be better off talking to a brick wall I guess.
    I watched it and formed my own opinion which is that it is a right-wing echo chamber. At least I watched to find out.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,953
    Quote Originally Posted by SwalePie View Post
    I watched it and formed my own opinion which is that it is a right-wing echo chamber. At least I watched to find out.
    So does this make our moderator a leftie then?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    24,780
    Quote Originally Posted by macstop View Post
    So does this make our moderator a leftie then?
    I don't think we have a moderator yet, but personally I like to think I'm slightly left of centre these days.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,953
    Quote Originally Posted by SwalePie View Post
    I don't think we have a moderator yet, but personally I like to think I'm slightly left of centre these days.
    That's fair enough, but in the video there were no mention of left or right politics, you might as well say he was a racist, but of cause there was no mention of racism, instead why don't you just say he was right or wrong that's a better argument.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2023
    Posts
    188
    Quote Originally Posted by Magpies1959 View Post
    More expected crap replies from the lefties. If you won't watch it how can you form an opinion. The presenters may have their hearts to the right but they have guests on to give the other side of the argument. I would be better off talking to a brick wall I guess.
    They don't just have their "hearts to the right", they're some of the most hard-right wing figures within mainstream politics. You can have your own political views and still be thoughtful and fair-minded, but there's nothing in that cast of characters' background that would give that impression. There are not trained journalists.

    I'm sceptical both about (a) whether left wing guests do actually appear, who they are, and whether they're any good; and (b) whether they're treated fairly/given equal airtime. It's absolute madness having sitting Tory MPs (including recent ministers) presenting news and current affairs programmes. How can that be right or fair? It's such a conflict of interest.

    Imagine a left wing version of GB "News". Instead of Farage, we have Corbyn. Instead of Wooton, we sub in Owen Jones, instead of Rees Mogg we have John O'Donnell. I don't really know enough about Dewberry... perhaps Gina Miller? Parallels don't need to be exact.

    Would you watch that? Would you trust that? I'm left wing, and I wouldn't watch that... not as a news channel anyway. Without neutral presenters and interviewers (or as near as we can get), there's no balance and no challenge. It's the definition of an echo chamber.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    35,952
    Quote Originally Posted by Magpies1959 View Post
    More expected crap replies from the lefties. If you won't watch it how can you form an opinion. The presenters may have their hearts to the right but they have guests on to give the other side of the argument. I would be better off talking to a brick wall I guess.
    I think even the brick wall would laugh at you on this one!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2023
    Posts
    1,431
    Quote Originally Posted by upthemaggies View Post
    I'd say some big players in tech and security have been waiting for something like this to seize on the opportunity, the evidence is apparently out there that they were talking about this kind of thing before Covid happened, but exponential advance in bio-technology (ability to download and reproduce a virus sequences in relatively cheap labs in rogue states) was always likely to throw something like this up eventually and a bio-terrorist attack or bio-warfare can't be ruled out in future, though you'd now have the "Cry Wolf" problem because they pushed it way too far with Covid-19.
    this makes total sense to me until the bolded they that assumes there was definitely, unequivocally, a conscious conspiracy planned between [...] to profit from covid. I mean, it's not like some people need incentive to capitalize on all things, even awful things like PPE in a pandemic, is it Magpies59?

    By focusing on the govts, pfizer WHO, Bill Gates et al, you seem to be saying 1. they prepared to profit from a pandemic and did so, and 2. that the spontaneous urge to profit from covid is not as bad as a planned response to a pandemic. Am I reading you right?
    Last edited by Mud Pie; 29-06-2023 at 01:42 AM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    18,918
    Quote Originally Posted by Mud Pie View Post
    this makes total sense to me until the bolded they that assumes there was definitely, unequivocally, a conscious conspiracy planned between [...] to profit from covid. I mean, it's not like some people need incentive to capitalize on all things, even awful things like PPE in a pandemic, is it Magpies59?

    By focusing on the govts, pfizer WHO, Bill Gates et al, you seem to be saying 1. they prepared to profit from a pandemic and did so, and 2. that the spontaneous urge to profit from covid is not as bad as a planned response to a pandemic. Am I reading you right?
    Any crisis presents an opportunity to make money and leverage power, all of the big players would have foreseen this and were ready to jump on an opportunity that presented itself. It would have reached the point where they 'sort of' wanted it, and once you're there, decisions start being made that compromise security.

    I think it's similar to 9/11, I don't believe for a moment that those attacks were planned and set up by the west, but they knew something was coming and maybe those in a position to make the final decisions to intervene dithered knowing in the back of their minds that some sort of attack on America would be a very convenient pretext for what ultimately followed.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2021
    Posts
    2,579
    It makes a change to watch a news channel where both sides of the story are heard, in a sensible debate, and the public can have their views heard as well. It is no wonder the lefties on here don't like it, as if they hear anything they don't agree with they will try and cancel it.

    As I have said on here before, I have no political allegiance, left and right both have good and bad ideas, but in my eyes GB News has brought some balance to the reporting of news and tells some news stories that the BBC, ITV and Sky would want to keep hush hushed.

    They also have a light hearted programme looking at the news headlines, which takes the p*ss out of both Tory and Labour, very refreshing. A bit like Have I Got News for You, before it became a bash the Tories vehicle.

Page 255 of 412 FirstFirst ... 155205245253254255256257265305355 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •