+ Visit Nottingham Forest FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: Well here it is

  1. #21

    re: Well here it is

    Quote Originally Posted by HopefulPie
    Why doesn't Fawaz cover the loses out of the millions he has? He's allowed to do so under FFP but not as a loan. Surely if Premier League football is the aim then you'd take the hit for a season or two with the hope of getting to the promised land?
    No he can't, he could if Forest were in the League One, but the rules are different in the Championship. [/quote]

    Yes he can Linky below[/quote]

    Sorry I don't understand your point, your link says exactly what I wrote! If Nottingham Forest was in League 1 "Turnover figure includes donations from the owners to the club and injections of equity" and therefore the owner is free to put in as much as he wants. But in the Championship the clubs are allowed to make a loss of only 8M if the owner donates 5M and 3M as loan. Nottingham Forest losses are way above this limit and therefore the owner pu

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    21,689

    re: Well here it is

    Quote Originally Posted by Mansfield_Blade
    Why doesn't Fawaz cover the loses out of the millions he has? He's allowed to do so under FFP but not as a loan. Surely if Premier League football is the aim then you'd take the hit for a season or two with the hope of getting to the promised land?
    No he can't, he could if Forest were in the League One, but the rules are different in the Championship. [/quote]

    Yes he can Linky below[/quote]

    Sorry I don't understand your point, your link says exactly what I wrote! If Nottingham Forest was in League 1 "Turnover figure includes donations from the owners to the club and injections of equity" and therefore the owner is free to put in as much as he wants. But in the Championship the clubs are allowed to make a loss of only 8M if the owner donates 5M and 3M as loan. Nottingham Forest losse

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    4,041

    re: Well here it is

    Quote Originally Posted by Mansfield_Blade
    Why doesn't Fawaz cover the loses out of the millions he has? He's allowed to do so under FFP but not as a loan. Surely if Premier League football is the aim then you'd take the hit for a season or two with the hope of getting to the promised land?
    No he can't, he could if Forest were in the League One, but the rules are different in the Championship. [/quote]

    Yes he can Linky below[/quote]

    Sorry I don't understand your point, your link says exactly what I wrote! If Nottingham Forest was in League 1 "Turnover figure includes donations from the owners to the club and injections of equity" and therefore the owner is free to put in as much as he wants. But in the Championship the clubs are allowed to make a loss of only 8M if the owner donates 5M and 3M as loan. Nottingham Forest losse

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    8,383

    re: Well here it is

    Quote Originally Posted by Mansfield_Blade
    Why doesn't Fawaz cover the loses out of the millions he has? He's allowed to do so under FFP but not as a loan. Surely if Premier League football is the aim then you'd take the hit for a season or two with the hope of getting to the promised land?
    No he can't, he could if Forest were in the League One, but the rules are different in the Championship. [/quote]

    Yes he can Linky below[/quote]

    Sorry I don't understand your point, your link says exactly what I wrote! If Nottingham Forest was in League 1 "Turnover figure includes donations from the owners to the club and injections of equity" and therefore the owner is free to put in as much as he wants. But in the Championship the clubs are allowed to make a loss of only 8M if the owner donates 5M and 3M as loan. Nottingham Forest losse

  5. #25

    re: Well here it is

    Quote Originally Posted by Trickytreesreds
    [/quote]

    That's not 100% true. I would concede we did exceed FFP for 2013/2014. However, the embargo is applied only if you cannot show that you are taking measures to comply. Revenue from transfers and cuts to wages of staff, will show you this. Had we not had the injury disaster last season, where we-
    1. Couldn't get rid of injured bodies
    2. Needed every fit body we had to cover

    we would surely have been shipping players out a lot sooner.
    We had to, our squad was huge on paper, but not on the pitch.
    Lihaj, Wilson, Reid, Cohen, Blackstock, Hobbs, all high wages. I'd say a conservative 3 to 4 million there for little return.

    Not being able to wheel and deal for a year would be a disaster. Obviously something has had to give and here it is.
    As Es*** says, the best players you have, are always in danger of being poached.
    We nee

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •