+ Visit Derby County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 78

Thread: by-election

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    514

    re: by-election

    Quote Originally Posted by "Trickytreesreds" as opposed to a party who arguably have a fascist ideology? There's no denying the lot of them are a bunch of ****s, but some less than others. Whoever gets in, policy won't change too dramatically. It's now about sticking two fingers up at the tossers we've had to ensure for too long.[/quote

    Probably because the Green party would double taxes to explore every green alternative they could think of. A windmill in every back garden, ban all cars and shoot every cow for farting.
    Everyone would have to wear clogs and clothes made from straw.
    Basie would probably masturbate himself into a coma.
    I've got no problem with paying more tax, as long as what I get for my money is better also. Take many Scandinavian countries for instance where tax is a hell of a lot more than here. Their public services **** all over ours. If this is the alte

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    368

    re: by-election

    Never thought I would find myself agreeing with Brainjim and Awks but give me the Greens over UKIP any day
    F*ckwit
    And
    Racist
    Aggressive
    Gob****es
    Enfranchised

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    21,692

    re: by-election

    Quote Originally Posted by "Akwesasne" as opposed to a party who arguably have a fascist ideology? There's no denying the lot of them are a bunch of ****s, but some less than others. Whoever gets in, policy won't change too dramatically. It's now about sticking two fingers up at the tossers we've had to ensure for too long.[/quote

    Probably because the Green party would double taxes to explore every green alternative they could think of. A windmill in every back garden, ban all cars and shoot every cow for farting.
    Everyone would have to wear clogs and clothes made from straw.
    Basie would probably masturbate himself into a coma.
    The Greens have no need to double taxes, they would just collect that which is now being avoided. They are the party of Animal Rights so why should they shoot them. It's UKIP for some reason that wants

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    21,695

    re: by-election

    Quote Originally Posted by Akwesasne
    I wonder who bought up the idea that we live in a free country. I don't think we have ever been or ever will. From the times of Roman slavery to Anglo-Saxon feudal serfdom and later the Roman Catholic Inquisition we've always been under someone's thumb. Even the right to graze livestock on common land was taken away by the Enclosures Act and the Highland Clearances. Most people have three options, wage slavery making more money for the rich or being cannon fodder fighting the rich man's wars, and of course if you don't like that,starving to death.
    Bloody hell Awks a half sensible post - of course it all depends upon what one measn by "free"!!!

    As a rue I avoid political debate but one can't help feeling there is a whiff of 1930's germany - times are hard lets find some sector of the population to blame - funny how its never those who came by their wealth by dubious means over the centuries and the british publics never ending des

  5. #35
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    6,775

    re: by-election

    I love it how people like awks who don't have a clue what they're on about think it's so simple to 'collect avoidance tax'.

    this is something I know a fair bit about and believe me, it's not easy because of very smart lawyers and accountants. The current government introduced something called 'accelerated payments' recently which is by far the biggest measure any government has taken in recent times to stop tax avoidance on small companies and directors. obviously huge multinationals is a different ball game.

    it a bit like taxing at 50%, there is a fine line between taxing to generate more revenue, and taxing inefficiently but either way it isn't simple to get past lawyers etc.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    4,887

    re: by-election

    Quote Originally Posted by Rapid
    I love it how people like awks who don't have a clue what they're on about think it's so simple to 'collect avoidance tax'.

    this is something I know a fair bit about and believe me, it's not easy because of very smart lawyers and accountants. The current government introduced something called 'accelerated payments' recently which is by far the biggest measure any government has taken in recent times to stop tax avoidance on small companies and directors. obviously huge multinationals is a different ball game.

    it a bit like taxing at 50%, there is a fine line between taxing to generate more revenue, and taxing inefficiently but either way it isn't simple to get past lawyers etc.
    It's just a question of introducing smart laws to outsmart the smart lawyers and smart accountants and more importantly a smart electorate to elect smart politicians capable of doing that, instead of those who seeing which way the crowd is heading and say "f

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    4,887

    re: by-election

    Swaledale - thanks for reminding me that this board is a Redneck free zone, unlike that which the Forest board has become.Long may it be so.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    6,775

    re: by-election

    Quote Originally Posted by Akwesasne
    I love it how people like awks who don't have a clue what they're on about think it's so simple to 'collect avoidance tax'.

    this is something I know a fair bit about and believe me, it's not easy because of very smart lawyers and accountants. The current government introduced something called 'accelerated payments' recently which is by far the biggest measure any government has taken in recent times to stop tax avoidance on small companies and directors. obviously huge multinationals is a different ball game.

    it a bit like taxing at 50%, there is a fine line between taxing to generate more revenue, and taxing inefficiently but either way it isn't simple to get past lawyers etc.
    It's just a question of introducing smart laws to outsmart the smart lawyers and smart accountants and more importantly a smart electorate to elect smart politicians capable of doing that, instead of those who s

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    4,887

    re: by-election

    Quote Originally Posted by Rapid
    I love it how people like awks who don't have a clue what they're on about think it's so simple to 'collect avoidance tax'.

    this is something I know a fair bit about and believe me, it's not easy because of very smart lawyers and accountants. The current government introduced something called 'accelerated payments' recently which is by far the biggest measure any government has taken in recent times to stop tax avoidance on small companies and directors. obviously huge multinationals is a different ball game.

    it a bit like taxing at 50%, there is a fine line between taxing to generate more revenue, and taxing inefficiently but either way it isn't simple to get past lawyers etc.
    It's just a question of introducing smart laws to outsmart the smart lawyers and smart accountants and more importantly a smart electorate to elect smart politicians ca

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    21,692

    re: by-election

    Quote Originally Posted by Akwesasne
    I love it how people like awks who don't have a clue what they're on about think it's so simple to 'collect avoidance tax'.

    this is something I know a fair bit about and believe me, it's not easy because of very smart lawyers and accountants. The current government introduced something called 'accelerated payments' recently which is by far the biggest measure any government has taken in recent times to stop tax avoidance on small companies and directors. obviously huge multinationals is a different ball game.

    it a bit like taxing at 50%, there is a fine line between taxing to generate more revenue, and taxing inefficiently but either way it isn't simple to get past lawyers etc.
    It's just a question of introducing smart laws to outsmart the smart lawyers and smart accountants and more importantly a

Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •