+ Visit Leeds United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 45

Thread: Saints slipping Halo apparently.

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,026
    Quote Originally Posted by ozleeds View Post
    So when I said 3 years or so ago he was killing the players I got scorned on When I said his playing style is not sustainable I got
    When I said we can't finish a season out we get burnt out and the only reason we got promoted was because of the COVID timing and the weeks off I got So now after all that time I have to read what i said all along
    And the winning lottery numbers are ?????? bonus ball ?

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    17,173
    Quote Originally Posted by Billyni View Post
    Find it hard to buy into the theory that Radz and Orta were naive.
    They are high flying business men with 50 years experience between them.
    Replace naive with, at the very best, stupid. Although there are many other words of description available.
    Radrizzani isn't, and never was, a successful football club owner (and it looks like his Italian adventure us having "issues", how sad), he is a very rich man (by comparison w8th thee and me) who has made his money by establishing a successful sports broadcasting rights brokerage. Orta is a three times failed attempt at being someone who can identify suitable talent to fill gaps and supply improved performance to th teams he has worked with. Again, his new employers appear to be discovering just how sh1te he is at that.

    Neither are "high flying" in the areas necessary for successful club ownership/management.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    17,173
    Quote Originally Posted by Billyni View Post
    Another hmmm.
    2nd paragraph of wtf post no.22 may not be far of the mark.
    It's fine. Bates isn't a popular figure with Leeds supporters (me included), for a great many disservices he inflicted on the club, but had he not dine what he did, there wouldn't have been a club for him to exploit.

    Which would be preferable, no Bates, or no LUFC? It's simply not possible to wish for the eradication of one without the other no longer existing. Not a saviour, more a necessary evil.

  4. #34
    We will never know as impossible to say what would have actually happened but we would have survived in some form or other.

    Not sure which I dislike the most that Bates was owner and Chairman or that Colin was manager.

    A dark dark period.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    17,173
    Quote Originally Posted by hopelesslyoptimistic View Post
    We will never know as impossible to say what would have actually happened but we would have survived in some form or other.

    Not sure which I dislike the most that Bates was owner and Chairman or that Colin was manager.

    A dark dark period.
    Yes we do (know what would have actually happened). Both the FA and HMRC were determined to see LUFC obliterated, and attempted over three years after Bates took ownership of LUFC to contest the process of transfer of ownership, and sought to impose payment conditions
    of outstanding debt that would, if successful have bankrupted the legal entity that was LUFC. Bates fought that attempt and saw both the FA & HMRC abandon their attempts to impose sanctions and the resulting insolvency of the club which after previous events would have led to the obliteration of LUFC.

    They wanted to see the back of LUFC, and Bates prevented that, of that there is unequivocal evidence, try and find an alternative conclusion.

    Saviour? No. As I said earlier, necessary evil? You betcha.(The enemy of my enemy is my friend (for a time))

    Yes, I'm replying to YOU.
    Last edited by WTF11; 28-09-2023 at 11:15 PM.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    6,742
    Quote Originally Posted by Billyni View Post
    And the winning lottery numbers are ?????? bonus ball ?
    Won the lotto last week spent 43 bucks and got 9 back I call that a win

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    10,026
    Quote Originally Posted by WTF11 View Post
    Radrizzani isn't, and never was, a successful football club owner (and it looks like his Italian adventure us having "issues", how sad), he is a very rich man (by comparison w8th thee and me) who has made his money by establishing a successful sports broadcasting rights brokerage. Orta is a three times failed attempt at being someone who can identify suitable talent to fill gaps and supply improved performance to th teams he has worked with. Again, his new employers appear to be discovering just how sh1te he is at that.

    Neither are "high flying" in the areas necessary for successful club ownership/management.
    You don't need a degree in any 'area' to know if your being taken for a ride.

  8. #38
    Quote Originally Posted by WTF11 View Post
    Yes we do (know what would have actually happened). Both the FA and HMRC were determined to see LUFC obliterated, and attempted over three years after Bates took ownership of LUFC to contest the process of transfer of ownership, and sought to impose payment conditions
    of outstanding debt that would, if successful have bankrupted the legal entity that was LUFC. Bates fought that attempt and saw both the FA & HMRC abandon their attempts to impose sanctions and the resulting insolvency of the club which after previous events would have led to the obliteration of LUFC.

    They wanted to see the back of LUFC, and Bates prevented that, of that there is unequivocal evidence, try and find an alternative conclusion.

    Saviour? No. As I said earlier, necessary evil? You betcha.(The enemy of my enemy is my friend (for a time))

    Yes, I'm replying to YOU.
    Suggest you read the accounts and information from the time - if you are talking about the administration when Bates was in control - there were other offers but the way Bates had structured the club at the time meant there was no chance of it being sold to anyone else - lots of very good articles at the time which did a lot of background digging.

    The fall from grace from the Prem he had has Chelsea cash but there were others in the background.

    As such, you just don’t know but you did say he saves the club which I am pretty sure is a stretch at best.

    A lot of what he did took years to unwind.

  9. #39
    Fair to say I am not sure we will ever agree on that one especially the admin and L1 as there were other people in the background.

    Another reason to be grateful the 49ers are now in charge.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    17,173
    Quote Originally Posted by Billyni View Post
    You don't need a degree in any 'area' to know if your being taken for a ride.
    Shows how naive and gullible Radrizzani was, n'est pas?

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •