
Originally Posted by
ragingpup
Not upset in the least. Just enjoying seeing you unable to give an answer to the simple question of what your preferred outcome would be to the likely rejection of May's deal in the commons?
I understand the drawbacks of the 'Norway' option but as I think I may have already indicated, and that you seem to struggle to comprehend, I am willing to accept FoM and parts of the ECJ in order to secure friction-less trade and travel with the EU. I can see that you are trying to deflect having to answer the question by looking at drawbacks in my preference.
This is what you do.
In fact this is all you do. Far from being the sophisticated person, above taking party sides, your way is to wait until the Government form a policy and then defend it to the hilt from critics. Well good luck to you lad.
Unfortunately for you, I have already identified the compromises in my preference and am standing by that. Something has to give as there is little chance of this getting through. So it would seem have a number of the cabinet, possibly Mrs May herself as a Plan B. I guess when she and they emerge with this Plan B following the defeat, you'll suddenly be on here defending it! Try thinking for yourself lad! It's good for the brain.
So, back to the questions: if you are rejecting the compromise of a deal along these lines, that leaves you with either a preference of:
1. A return to the EU with a Harder Brexit deal in the hope that they would listen and not just piss themselves laughing.
2. Walking away at the commons rejection with no attempt to re-negotiate and just accepting a No Deal.
Which of these two remaining options are you in favour of?
(I'm beginning to think that your inability to answer this simple question indicates that you're quietly a Remainer, but daren't say so out loud! Is that it? You saucy devil!)