First question on the Muppet Show yesterday from the BBC, something about is the government ashamed that some nurses don't have adequate PPE. A strange question, when the public want to get the latest info out of ministers and government, this BBC halfwit prefers to play games. As it's the responsibilty of the NHS, envy of the world, to procure PPE for it's front-line staff, why not address the question to the body responsible for the shortage, the NHS, unless of course the BBC has an agenda.
Does the BBC have an agenda ? Try this....
"Last Friday morning, at 6, 7, 8 and 9 am, the news on BBC Radio 4 led with the story that “The boss of an NHS Trust has asked the BBC to put him in touch with a fashion company making protective gowns, because he fears he’s about to run out.” The reporter, Simon Browning, said that the executive had asked for the phone number of a Burberry factory. The story accused the Government of falling down on PPE “despite assurances from ministers that there’s enough to go round”. The “boss” reportedly described the Government’s claim there was no shortage of gowns as “fantasy”. This sounded odd to me. Was the NHS boss so clueless that he had to ask our national broadcaster how to get hold of Burberry? If so, could one trust him to get PPE from anywhere? I was also suspicious of the fact that the source refused to speak directly and that the Today programme which followed the news did not follow up the report. It seemed sketchy. Later that day, modestly concealed in the Business section of the BBC News website, a “correction” appeared: “We should clarify that the person concerned is not the boss of an NHS trust but is part of a network of organisations helping to source personal protective equipment for some NHS trusts. The mistake was caused by a misunderstanding of the person’s role in the fight against the pandemic.” The correction understated the problem. If the person looking for Burberry was not an NHS boss, but only someone who was helping chase PPE gowns, it was not worthy of the national news at all, let alone the hourly lead. The BBC’s “misunderstanding of the person’s role” collapsed the entire tale.
How did this story get broadcast, then?"
So how did it get broadcast, go back to the start of this post for the answer. That's how the BBC FAKE NEWS factory operates, broadcast the lies, the FAKE NEWS, then when found out, tuck away the retraction where no one will notice it.



Reply With Quote

