Yet The Mail, The Mirror, The Guardian, the BBC and others say 4 million.Originally Posted by Brockley_Jack
Which one do you think is "lazy journalism", BJ?
|
| + Visit Southampton FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
I wouldn't mind guessing that PF got £9m from the source that broke the original story, Sky Sports. STL it says between £8m and £10m, therefore making £9m a reasonable estimate.Originally Posted by chiswickmart
Why don't you get your facts straight before throwing stones, fairweather? - view external link
Yet The Mail, The Mirror, The Guardian, the BBC and others say 4 million.Originally Posted by Brockley_Jack
Which one do you think is "lazy journalism", BJ?
Yet The Mail, The Mirror, The Guardian, the BBC and others say 4 million.Originally Posted by BilltheCat
Which one do you think is "lazy journalism", BJ?[/quote]
I couldn't care less. How about you re-read the posts, ignoramus?
It's a done deal according to SSN, medical tomorrow.
And guess what, they're saying it's 4m too. - view external linkOriginally Posted by Pentridge
Initial 4m...
Good luck to him if he goes. Been afor us.
Bristol Rovers get the benefit of a sell on clause apparently. Good for them but makes the four mil we get seem even smaller.
15% is what I've heard on another forum.
4m for someone our charity thieving neighbours have branded a useless overweight L2 player for the last four years sounds like good business to me.