Careless Tories!

[MadAmster]

Just back off holiday (Fuerteventura). Met a bloke out there and his political stance came out as hot, steaming BS. Yes, the bloke's a Lava Tory.

[Trickytreesreds]

Like I said, I wouldn't trust any of them. They all lie and weave webs

Sue Gray, the former top civil servant who led the Partygate inquiry into Boris Johnson, went into talks to work with Sir Keir Starmer last October months before she officially quit.

The ex-Cabinet Office fixer has now been cleared in a report to work for Starmer as early as September.

It means that despite her intimate knowledge of the government's plans and timetable she will only have had to wait six months since dramatically stepping down.
Jeremy Quin, boldly entitled: "Prima facie breach of the Civil Service code by the former Second Permanent Secretary for the Union and the Constitution".

They claim it will confirm that both Sue Gray and Labour broke civil service rules by failing to inform the government about job discussions for four months.

Another source says: "Officials are pretty embarrassed by her and how little time she’s got. They had said she should get [minimum] a year and would have advised even longer".

"A bad day for civil service."

[Geoff Parkstone]

Looks like Ben Stokes must be a Tory - careless and leading a load of incompetents?

[ramAnag]

Don’t understand your latest conspiracy theory, Tricky.
Sue Grey has done nothing wrong. Johnson appointed her and told everyone how capable she was...until he didn’t like her findings.
Civil Servants advise and implement Government policy. Protecting Tory Party secrets isn’t part of her brief.
She is free to seek alternative employment.
No different from anyone who leaves one organisation/company/club to be employed by a rival...imo.

[Geoff Parkstone]

Don’t understand your latest conspiracy theory, Tricky.
Sue Grey has done nothing wrong. Johnson appointed her and told everyone how capable she was...until he didn’t like her findings.
Civil Servants advise and implement Government policy. Protecting Tory Party secrets isn’t part of her brief.
She is free to seek alternative employment.
No different from anyone who leaves one organisation/company/club to be employed by a rival...imo.

Mr predictible again

[MadAmster]

Mr predictible again

Pretty much like your spelling

[ramAnag]

Mr predictible again

Really? The most predictable thing on here at the moment is that, whatever I write, you’ll act like some sort of obsessive stalker.
Perhaps you could explain a) how is my response predictable? b) what is incorrect about what I’ve written? c) why you feel the need to be so consistently negative and pointlessly antagonistic.
There again...perhaps I just don’t care. It was the 38 goal thing last week...now it’s responding to comments from another poster about Sue Gray. For a once decent poster...and entirely predictably...on neither occasion have you written anything remotely worthwhile.

[Geoff Parkstone]

Trouble with predictave text

[Trickytreesreds]

Don’t understand your latest conspiracy theory, Tricky.
Sue Grey has done nothing wrong. Johnson appointed her and told everyone how capable she was...until he didn’t like her findings.
Civil Servants advise and implement Government policy. Protecting Tory Party secrets isn’t part of her brief.
She is free to seek alternative employment.
No different from anyone who leaves one organisation/company/club to be employed by a rival...imo.

It was supposed to be about impartiality RA.
Obviously Grey had double agent intentions. Johnson obviously didn't see the red running through her and Starmer did.

They met a long time before what they claimed.
Again I'll say it. Trust them? Not on your life

[SithHappens]

It was supposed to be about impartiality RA.
Obviously Grey had double agent intentions. Johnson obviously didn't see the red running through her and Starmer did.

They met a long time before what they claimed.
Again I'll say it. Trust them? Not on your life

Come on Tricky, clearly nothing improper, even Starmer himself says so