Tommy Robinson

[DCFCArmy]

You are a disgrace defending those scumbags

OHHHH TOMMY TOMMY, TOMMY TOMMY TOMMY ROBINSON, OHHHH TOMMY TOMMY, TOMMY TOMMY TOMMY ROBINSON

[Andy_Faber]

Now you’ve spoilt it

[Romanis]

Good try, come the appointed day he'll be welcomed back by me at least, 'til he reverts to old ways

Hopefully very soon.
The forum is clearly lacking in certain areas without his well researched and objective pronouncements.

[Romanis]

DcfcA is making some very strong statements in the defense of country.
I'm quite convinced that a healthy majority of people in this country agree with him.
It's also quite clear that for some unbeknownst reasons, the tiniest majority that opposes it seem to be posting on this forum.

Very odd coincidence don't you think?

[mistaram]

DcfcA is making some very strong statements in the defense of country.

I'm quite convinced that a healthy majority of people in this country agree with him.
It's also quite clear that for some unbeknownst reasons, the tiniest majority that opposes it seem to be posting on this forum.

Very odd coincidence don't you think?

No the tiniest majority that agrees with him in this forum is one and that's you

[Geoff Parkstone]

Aye, this forum appears to appeal to the very *****s and rapists that good old Tommy and his bestie DCFCA want to batter, alhamdulillah.

[Andy_Faber]

Seriously y’all, constructive discussion rather than mudslinging or it’s locked

[MadAmster]

My bad for quoting the Independent on the %'s. Sorry for that. I hadn't seen that those figures had been somehow discredited.

Am I a racist? No.

Do I support *** offenders? No.

Do I support Mr Yaxley-Lennon? No. I find it very hard to have any sympathy for a bloke who commits a crime, gets a suspended sentence for doing so, is very clearly warned by the sentencing judge what a repeat of that offence will mean for him and then just a year later does the same and doesn't stop even when told by court officials that he shouldn't be doing it. Add to that the extra trauma he would be dumping on the victims of the ongoing parallel trials which could have been ruled mistrials (either having to testify yet again by a retrial or have to live with the knowledge that their rapists had got away with it because Yaxley-Lennon's actions had led the judge to deem it impossible for them to get a fair trial.....)

DCFCA, the bit I have highlighted is the most important part of this to me. I would ask you to consider the effect Yaxley-Lennon's actions could have had on the victims. Do you really think that the price they could have paid through YL's actions was a situation the bloke should have put them in? Believe me, this possibility will have been put to them just in case they hadn't realised it themselves so that they could attempt to prepare themselves for the eventuality.

Yaxley-Lennon is IMO, amongst other things, a selfish sod who doesn't have a care in the world for any fallout from his actions as long as it serves HIS ends and provides him with publicity.

BTW, it is also my sincere opinion that he had a damned good idea that he would be arrested, charged, tried and sent down and that it somehow fits in to his plan, whatever that may be.

[Romanis]

To cut a long story short, why don't we all agree that DCFCA is right?

[Romanis]

Sorry...’divisiveness’ not ‘decisiveness’...bloody predictor text!

No RA you were right the first time around.
It's his decisiveness that frightens many because he's extremely straightforward and truthful. Many can't deal with it.