Sutton Utd

[PedroTheFisherman66]

Cropping up week in week out isn't a problem, cropping up every thread is. Surely enough people have told you how boring you are.
By the way read my post again and point out the shambles bit?
How old are you by the way? your juvenile drivel puts you in the junior school bracket,
God help your class teacher.
More to be pitied than scorned

Like I say walk on by if you dont like it grandad...!

[laddo]

Ageism?

Handbags Thread R.I.P.

"Gone but not forgotten"

"It had a good run"

"Never posted in it, never even viewed it"

[Elite_Pie]

Ageism?

Have you ever posted insults regarding age laddo?

Think carefully before you answer.

[bule1]

Pedro, disagree fine, insults about age???? Please debate without insults.

[TSANHO]

Sutton have done tremendously well and thoroughly deserved their promotion....but it is annoying that we actually managed to beat them twice!

There is no shame in losing out to Sutton at all though, Leicester City have shown us that a well run club can achieve great things without the spending power of the bigger clubs in their respective leagues.

We are now well on the way to becoming another well run club, one of those we have been envious of for so long. The next ten, fif**** and twenty years will be much different to the last twenty 😊

[PedroTheFisherman66]

Pedro, disagree fine, insults about age???? Please debate without insults.

Perhaps you should read what hes wrote about me.i have refrained on many occasions from insulting him but I think hes insulted me more than enough times to warrant a rebuke.
Have a read and then come and apologise.

[bule1]

Pedro, to be honest you come across to me (my opinion!!) as the most aggressive poster I know on here currently. I know others are not pure but steady on with insults. Please argue fact/opinion with fact/opinion in a balanced fashion.

We can disagree (strongly) but to ALL on here please stop the name calling in the defence of our opinion. Note the fact I said to all on the second part, there is no single culprit in some of these personal spats.

[PedroTheFisherman66]

Pedro, to be honest you come across to me (my opinion!!) as the most aggressive poster I know on here currently. I know others are not pure but steady on with insults. Please argue fact/opinion with fact/opinion in a balanced fashion.

We can disagree (strongly) but to ALL on here please stop the name calling in the defence of our opinion. Note the fact I said to all on the second part, there is no single culprit in some of these personal spats.

Like I said did you not see him insulting me several times?so I accept your apology and cant wait to see you rebuke 61p for his remarks aswell
Xxx
Ps I think I've been very tame lately since my ban infact.
May I ask if you were or are in the pro Ardley camp?
I only ask as its all about perspective

[bule1]

Like I said did you not see him insulting me several times?so I accept your apology and cant wait to see you rebuke 61p for his remarks aswell
Xxx
Ps I think I've been very tame lately since my ban infact.
May I ask if you were or are in the pro Ardley camp?
I only ask as its all about perspective

I am in the pro NCFC camp, neither pro/anti Ardley. On a positive for him when we were possibly going to cease to exist, he stayed and in very little time built up a team that got to the playoff final. On the negative his playoff final was bad, second season OK(ish) but not confident we would have got promoted. Therefore whilst I would have remained loyal my confidence would not have been great.

If your asking if IB is better that NA, the answer is yes. The one pro Ardley point I will make is that if he left we would have had nothing as a squad last season at the start.


Final point is regardless of the pro/anti Ardley battle all deserve respect for their opinions. Please to all, either side, keep it balanced.

[PedroTheFisherman66]

I am in the pro NCFC camp, neither pro/anti Ardley. On a positive for him when we were possibly going to cease to exist, he stayed and in very little time built up a team that got to the playoff final. On the negative his playoff final was bad, second season OK(ish) but not confident we would have got promoted. Therefore whilst I would have remained loyal my confidence would not have been great.

If your asking if IB is better that NA, the answer is yes. The one pro Ardley point I will make is that if he left we would have had nothing as a squad last season at the start.


Final point is regardless of the pro/anti Ardley battle all deserve respect for their opinions. Please to all, either side, keep it balanced.

So by the sounds of it you were pro Ardley but have now had your head turned by a better coach but that's good to hear it takes a strong man to admit he was wrong.
I'm still not seeing you respond to any of the baiting / insults that 61P threw my way and the insults that I was responding to.
Also it would be nice if you could post some of these aggressive posts that you say I am guilty of writing that has lead you to that impression, I believe in the past few weeks you said.
I don't want you to turn out like one of our fellow posters on here that has called me a liar and a hypocrite but when asked to post any supporting evidence crumbled into a corner ,I would like to say to never to be heard again but that would be lying.
Personally I think some of my posts are challenging the holders view and I am open to persuasion if a convincing response is forthcoming.
my views are no secret I openly admit to them and I admit if some one comes on insulting me then I will respond in kind , I think that's fair enough, possibly you don't as you have not mentioned a word against 61P as yet.