
Originally Posted by
John2
Sorry I missed this.
OK, let's look at EXACTLY what we both said.
You claimed:
"They get really good money for housing migrants, 4 or 5 times more than your standard paying guest, you can se wht its attractive to Britannia group who own the "Grand" at Scarbados which also is housing migrants"
Your claim was that the Brittania group get paid 4 or 5 times more than standard guests for asylum seekers.
On 13th December I asked you to provide a link of where you got your information from that prompted your claim and wagered £100 to Rotherham hospice that you would be unable to do so - I was right.
I asked because I wanted to identify the sorts of places you were getting information from, part of the wager was that you shared the source of the exact claim you made.
You then posted a Daily Mail article from almost a month LATER. This was not your source unless you are a time traveller. This did not prove your claim, mentioned nothing of Britannia group, and instead discussed 4* hotels.
I've shown you exactly what you claimed, and exactly what the wager was for. You're just trying to wriggle out of it because you read something from a right-wing source, probably a social media post, misunderstood or blindly accepted its claims, and then parroted them here.
There's a theme.
Share your link that proves your claim that Britannia get 4-5x more for an asylum seeker or pay up. Or even that 4* hotels are typically costing £31.25 a night - as I generously also said I would accept even though totally irrelevant to the original wager.
It's you that needs to admit you were wrong. I've laid out the evidence, don't just hide behind "it's proven in an article [from the future]" because you know full well what you claimed isn't.