Should we cut our losses with Ross now.

[tHeArAb]

This exactly, raging at the attitude of some players. In any other job, if you down tools you get sacked. These people are meant to be professional football players. If some players are undermining the Jack Ross, get them to f@ck. Watt has done f'all and would not be missed. Mulgrew can be replaced by Ross Graham and Fletcher can be replaced Logan Chalmers if we recall him. We couldn't be any worse off than we are now ffs. We may have to take the hit, but right now we are championship bound anyway.

Drop, Fletcher? F*ck me. The boy must be wondering wtf he's done signing for us. He certainly doesn't need dropped. He needs someone decent along side him to latch on to the almost every long ball that he wins.

Logan Chalmers isn't on loan, he's at the club and has a stinking attitude. If anyone needs to piss off out of our club, it's him.

[utd4me]

If, and only if he is one of the players that is undermining Jack Ross which has been suggested then yes, drop him.

[the_arab]

If, and only if he is one of the players that is undermining Jack Ross which has been suggested then yes, drop him.

there are no players undermining him, hes simply setting the team up wrong

[tHeArAb]

there are no players undermining him, hes simply setting the team up wrong

Correct. I doubt Mulgrew would drop himself last weekend if he was 'running the team'.

[GUNBOAT]

If, and only if he is one of the players that is undermining Jack Ross which has been suggested then yes, drop him.

That's my fault then as i did post about Mulgrew,Watt and Fletcher because they travel together and Charlie and Steven stayed at The Malmaison hotel before yesterday's game.I doubt very much that Watt or Fletcher care much about how many play in defence but Charlie does and he has a massive influence in the dressing room.

I am also fairly certain that he had a massive influence on Tam Courts to almost assistant manager level and i suggest that is where some of our current problems lie.A new manager comes in who plays 4 at the back and all hell breaks loose not helped by the fact that we have no holding midfielders left at the club.

None of the above is FACT and i do not claim to have any inside knowledge but i don't think i'm far wrong with my thoughts.The big question is who does Tony back?,you would think the manager but that's not a certainty as he,Tam and Charlie had a few cosy chats when we went all out to sign him last summer.BTW i have absolutely nothing against Charlie whatsoever.

[tHeArAb]

I am also fairly certain that he had a massive influence on Tam Courts to almost assistant manager level and i suggest that is where some of our current problems lie.

What exactly are you basing this on? Genuine question.

[GUNBOAT]

Correct. I doubt Mulgrew would drop himself last weekend if he was 'running the team'.

I think his influence has diminished since Tam's departure,i cannie actually see any post where anyone is suggesting that Charlie runs the team though.

[tHeArAb]

I think his influence has diminished since Tam's departure,i cannie actually see any post where anyone is suggesting that Charlie runs the team though.

Aye, looks like I picked up your comment wrong as you were replying to an earlier comment by Weegie. Apologies.

[tHeArAb]

I find it strange that Mulgrew was given such a role in the team under Courts as has been suggested, but was overlooked for captain. Surely that would be a natural role for him if he was indeed being told to change the team during games.

[GUNBOAT]

What exactly are you basing this on? Genuine question.

I always thought that from the day that Tam and Tony persuaded Charlie to sign.To be honest i thought the majority of our support were under the same impression too.BTW i was delighted when we signed Charlie because Tony had appointed a rooky manager who was charged with blooding all our youngsters but at least we had a very experienced defender in to help the coach and the young players.