+ Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 51 to 59 of 59

Thread: Derry and Birchnall both now available

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    8,729
    Quote Originally Posted by WarsopPie View Post
    Brothers would probably go for someone like Steven Schumacher or Steven Naismith, age on there side no compensation to pay and have above average PPG values.
    After paying a fee for SM and his cronies they must realise theyve had there fingers burnt.
    I doubt we'd be able to afford either of those to be honest. Schumacher has managed in the Championship and won't want to drop down two levels. Likewise with Naismith, going from the third biggest team in Scotland to Notts.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    7,067
    Quote Originally Posted by i961pie View Post
    Didn't he leave us because he wanted to be based in or around the London area? Hence managing Charlton and Wimbledon.
    Was young then, plus was under Munto

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    7,067
    Quote Originally Posted by Chicken Balti Pie View Post
    They aren't forced to play in a certain way. We have a club philosophy of how we will play and the head coach is picked that buys into it. It's not difficult to understand, it makes perfect sense unlike certain former chairmen who hired Moniz directly after Derry, complete different styles. This way the squad doesn't need a massive overhaul either each season
    So, if the club have a philosophy, they have a certain style of what route they want to go down??
    Ardley was obviously told how they wanted the team to play, that's why he struggled & we were dire, tippy tappy. That wasn't his style, same as Nolan, when wee Willy said he wanted fast attacking football, bums off seats. All the Coaches since, have played the same style of play.
    Last edited by irishpete; 18-12-2024 at 08:23 AM.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    4,419
    Quote Originally Posted by irishpete View Post
    So, if the club have a philosophy, they have a certain style of what route they want to go down??
    Ardley was obviously told how they wanted the team to play, that's why he struggled & we were dire, tippy tappy. That wasn't his style, same as Nolan, when wee Willy said he wanted fast attacking football, bums off seats. All the Coaches since, have played the same style of play.
    Ardley wasn't their pick, they kept him on out of his loyalty to the club when he could have up sticks and leave. He wasn't a bad option for the situation we were in with no squad and no infrastructure set up. The reason he was "sacked" was because we had planned on replacing him with IB at the end of his contract but IB was getting attention elsewhere so they moved faster than planned.

    Yes, they asked him to play in a certain way, as that was going to be the club philosophy moving forward, then since then, all the coaches picked played in a way that matched that philosophy. Only Ardley was "forced" and I don't think he was against it either to be honest

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    8,997
    Quote Originally Posted by Chicken Balti Pie View Post
    Ardley wasn't their pick, they kept him on out of his loyalty to the club when he could have up sticks and leave. He wasn't a bad option for the situation we were in with no squad and no infrastructure set up. The reason he was "sacked" was because we had planned on replacing him with IB at the end of his contract but IB was getting attention elsewhere so they moved faster than planned.

    Yes, they asked him to play in a certain way, as that was going to be the club philosophy moving forward, then since then, all the coaches picked played in a way that matched that philosophy. Only Ardley was "forced" and I don't think he was against it either to be honest
    That all seems about right.
    Thankfully, the club has the example of our most ultra keep-possession side yet getting a record points haul and promotion.
    Fans critical of the overall approach should remember that. What drove me mad for decades was giving the ball away cheaply.
    Moments like LW telling the fans why short corners were better have aged well IMO.

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    4,936
    Quote Originally Posted by the_anticlough View Post
    That all seems about right.
    Thankfully, the club has the example of our most ultra keep-possession side yet getting a record points haul and promotion.
    Fans critical of the overall approach should remember that. What drove me mad for decades was giving the ball away cheaply.
    Moments like LW telling the fans why short corners were better have aged well IMO.
    Interesting article here about the tactics of the most successful side (currently) in England:

    https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/a...s/crmnv0g81gdo

    I’d love to know what our corresponding stats are for how much we pass the ball in the defensive third. Too much, I’d guess, given our current results. This bit stood out for me re Liverpool:

    “After 15 games in the league, the numbers show that Liverpool are looking to circulate the ball more in their own defensive third.
    Last season, the Reds averaged 117.2 passes per game in their defensive third according to Opta, whereas this term that figure has gone up to 133 passes. A small tweak and Liverpool look all the better for it.

    Slot's team are also attempting fewer shots in each match, down to 15.2 from 20.6 last season, which is perhaps another by-product of introducing a bit more control and conservatism into the system.

    All of this is not to say that Liverpool do not still rely on transitions and a direct attack-led approach. Rather, the way they manufacture these advantageous scenarios for themselves has changed.”

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    993
    Have it from a good source close to board members if the muppet loses against Bradford he?s a goner.
    Fingers crossed

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    6,937
    Quote Originally Posted by MagpieMeltdown View Post
    I find it staggering that folk are using the phrase ?knee jerk? for this current situation regarding SM.

    Knee jerk to me suggests a rash and premature decision to fire a manager/head coach, for example Craig Short, Derry, Moniz etc.

    Maynard?s record is utterly atrocious and should have gone a long, long time ago. A failed experiment that the Bros don?t want to admit they were wrong to make.

    There would absolutely nothing ?knee jerk? about getting rid of SM. In actual fact the owners either have the patience of saints, have lost interest, or aren?t prepared fall on their sword and admit they were wrong yet.
    Here are some stats. Will stand corrected if there are any errors;

    League Two 23/24
    P19, W5, D3, L11, GF29, GA35, GD-6, Pts 28 (1.47 PPG)

    League Two 24/25
    P19, W7, D7, L5, GF25, GA21, GD+4, Pts 28 (1.47 PPG)

    FA Cup 24/25
    P2, W1, D0, L1, GF8, GA5, GD+3

    League Cup 24/25
    P1, W0, D0, L1, GF3, GA3, GF0 (Lost 4-3 on penalties)

    EFL Trophy 24/25
    P3, W2, D0, L1, GF3, GA3, GD0

    Total
    P44, W16, D10, L19, GF68, GA67, GD+1

    Win Ratio 36.4%

  9. #59
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    4,419
    Quote Originally Posted by WarsopPie View Post
    Have it from a good source close to board members if the muppet loses against Bradford he?s a goner.
    Fingers crossed
    As only three member of the board exist (bros and Montague) not sure this is true

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •