+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789
Results 81 to 89 of 89

Thread: Burnley Post Match Thoughts

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    12,832
    Maybe do what the Americans do with their football and stop the clock every time the ball is not in play?

    Then you'd get a proper 90 minutes instead of the 60 minutes play we actually get.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    28,843
    Quote Originally Posted by great_fire View Post
    Maybe do what the Americans do with their football and stop the clock every time the ball is not in play?

    Then you'd get a proper 90 minutes instead of the 60 minutes play we actually get.
    It's an idea I've often favoured but if they were to implement it they would probably have to reduce playing time anyway or games would last much longer (~2.5-3.0 hours as typically in a 45+m half the ball is currently only in play around 32m). This is not necessarily a problem for 3pm kick-offs but would certainly be one for 8pm kick-offs with transportation etc.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    12,832
    Quote Originally Posted by CAMiller View Post
    It's an idea I've often favoured but if they were to implement it they would probably have to reduce playing time anyway or games would last much longer (~2.5-3.0 hours as typically in a 45+m half the ball is currently only in play around 32m). This is not necessarily a problem for 3pm kick-offs but would certainly be one for 8pm kick-offs with transportation etc.
    80 minute game with 10 minute break?

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by great_fire View Post
    80 minute game with 10 minute break?
    Or three 30 minute sections with two breaks

    If you're really going to **** up the game then do a good job in doing it

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    8,950
    Quote Originally Posted by great_fire View Post
    Maybe do what the Americans do with their football and stop the clock every time the ball is not in play?

    Then you'd get a proper 90 minutes instead of the 60 minutes play we actually get.
    I can't see that happening but a similar approach to that in rugby where the clock could be stopped for treatment to injuries and substitutions etc would make sense. The time left to play should also be made visible to everyone in the stadium.
    There was once a rule that a goalkeeper had to release the ball within 6 seconds. Does that still exist because, if so it's never enforced? Perhaps it would speed things up if an indirect free kick was awarded to the opposition every time the goalkeeper held onto the ball for longer than that.
    Maybe also have a rule that throw ins have to be taken within 6 seconds or the throw passes to the other team

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by mellowmiller View Post
    I can't see that happening but a similar approach to that in rugby where the clock could be stopped for treatment to injuries and substitutions etc would make sense. The time left to play should also be made visible to everyone in the stadium.
    There was once a rule that a goalkeeper had to release the ball within 6 seconds. Does that still exist because, if so it's never enforced? Perhaps it would speed things up if an indirect free kick was awarded to the opposition every time the goalkeeper held onto the ball for longer than that.
    Maybe also have a rule that throw ins have to be taken within 6 seconds or the throw passes to the other team
    On that rugby comparison, why not take away the time keeping away from the ref completely. Take away his watch, have an off field timekeeper. They’ve nearly done so with offside decisions and var so why not timekeeping?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    5,314
    They keep trying these "new" rules but they soon fade into the memory..............They'd rather ferk about with the offside rule.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    8,950
    Quote Originally Posted by Grist_To_The_Mill View Post
    On that rugby comparison, why not take away the time keeping away from the ref completely. Take away his watch, have an off field timekeeper. They’ve nearly done so with offside decisions and var so why not timekeeping?
    Absolutely. Maybe timekeeping could be something the 4th Official is responsible for because I'm not really sure what else they do apart from take abuse from managers about things they have no control over.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    9,423
    Oh dear Burnley concede from a disputed corner which will be “massively debated” and being done to death by sky….didn’t notice too much debate on Wednesday when they Burnley scored the winner…

Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •