+ Visit Burnley FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 98 of 281 FirstFirst ... 488896979899100108148198 ... LastLast
Results 971 to 980 of 3002

Thread: The Corona Virus

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by oldcolner View Post
    This man as he describes himself on his company website is not a vaccine expert but a litigator for money

    https://www.hja.net/legal-team/peter-todd/

    I am currently conducting a major multi-party action (90 clients) relating to Pandemrix® vaccine (the 2009/10 pandemic swine flu vaccine). The Claimants all have narcolepsy (a serious incurable neurological disorder) after the swine flu vaccination. Public funding has been granted.

    I am also currently acting for a number of Claimants in a product liability claim against Oculentis B.V. relating to injury and loss caused by defective intraocular lenses. The Claimants all had lens replacement surgery but their prosthetic lens has calcified due to contamination in the manufacturing process, resulting in the need for revision surgery or permanent loss of vision.

    I have also had success with claims under the Vaccine Damage Payment Act 1979, including with appeals against refusals of awards. This included successfully defending the first ever appeal by the DWP to the Court of Appeal in a case under the Vaccine Damage Payments Act 1979 in February 2017 in the case of DWP v John (a minor) [2017]

    I have achieved substantial settlements in a number of other product liability claims including regarding defective metal-on-metal hip prostheses.

    In October 2017 I was elected as the Secretary of the Product Liability Special Interest Group of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers.

    I am a ‘cyclist-friendly’ solicitor and have acted for many cyclists over the years who have suffered serious injury in road traffic collisions.

    Sounds like he makes his money by getting clients for class actions to me.
    "No faulty product = no adverse reaction, = no litigation" ~ Simples.

  2. #2
    I'm too busy preparing and strengthening myself for what is yet to come from our totally unfit for purpose Cabal of Cabinet Minister Conservative and Unionist Cretins to worry too much about the possible consequences of my refusal to be injected with a cocktail of untried, untested chemicals OC.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    25,140
    Quote Originally Posted by The Bedlington Terrier View Post
    I'm too busy preparing and strengthening myself for what is yet to come from our totally unfit for purpose Cabal of Cabinet Minister Conservative and Unionist Cretins to worry too much about the possible consequences of my refusal to be injected with a cocktail of untried, untested chemicals OC.
    Don't think you, or me, will get away with it BT, we won't. Besides the requirement to have a vax certificate to travel, there are now proposals that you will need one to attend a football match, a theatre or cinema, and even eating out in a restaurant. 1984 never really arrived when it was supposed to, but it's almost here now.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    13,001
    Quote Originally Posted by The Bedlington Terrier View Post
    I'm too busy preparing and strengthening myself for what is yet to come from our totally unfit for purpose Cabal of Cabinet Minister Conservative and Unionist Cretins to worry too much about the possible consequences of my refusal to be injected with a cocktail of untried, untested chemicals OC.
    You keep on about untried, untested chemicals BT
    45000 people have had it and more are getting it. At what point will you accept these have been tried and tested. 100k 1 million.....
    whatever you chose we will soon be there worldwide
    RNA is not a chemical either!
    Don’t let the facts interfere with your opinion.
    Lol

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    12,744
    Over 50,000 deaths now (probably over 60,000 in reality) in the last nine months. And still the worst three months of the year to come for this type of virus. We could be near 100,000 deaths in a calendar year by March.
    For those of you who claim that the figures are not unusual in a normal year, please show me a year when the deaths from flu approached these levels.

    The pandemic has resulted in an unparalleled worldwide response in trying to find a vaccine. I am not surprised in the least that the "experts" have delivered the goods, and I am more than confident that if it gets the green light then it will be safe.

    Given the scale and nastiness of the virus I will certainly take it, but it will be up to each individual whether they have it. I read somewhere that 25% of the population won't take it. this may reduce when it finally gets a clean bill of health.

    But there will still be a group of people who will refuse. Their choice. If they calculate that the odds of a serious side effect are greater that getting covid then I won't try to convince them. If they won't listen to the "experts" what chance does a bloke on the internet have? Trouble is, they are getting their info from other blokes on the internet to make their decision.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    13,001
    Quote Originally Posted by 1959_60 View Post
    Over 50,000 deaths now (probably over 60,000 in reality) in the last nine months. And still the worst three months of the year to come for this type of virus. We could be near 100,000 deaths in a calendar year by March.
    For those of you who claim that the figures are not unusual in a normal year, please show me a year when the deaths from flu approached these levels.

    The pandemic has resulted in an unparalleled worldwide response in trying to find a vaccine. I am not surprised in the least that the "experts" have delivered the goods, and I am more than confident that if it gets the green light then it will be safe.

    Given the scale and nastiness of the virus I will certainly take it, but it will be up to each individual whether they have it. I read somewhere that 25% of the population won't take it. this may reduce when it finally gets a clean bill of health.

    But there will still be a group of people who will refuse. Their choice. If they calculate that the odds of a serious side effect are greater that getting covid then I won't try to convince them. If they won't listen to the "experts" what chance does a bloke on the internet have? Trouble is, they are getting their info from other blokes on the internet to make their decision.
    Well said. 59. Some people believe weirdos on the internet more than the BBC and CBS

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by oldcolner View Post
    Well said. 59. Some people believe weirdos on the internet more than the BBC and CBS
    Trouble for me 59er is I seriously question which is true or in accordance with empirically proven fact or someone's "reality" which is made up to suit an agenda.

    I simply refuse to trust anything that comes out of the mouths of this Cabal of Cabinet Minister Conservative and Unionist Cretins or their goons from SAGE.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    13,001
    Quote Originally Posted by The Bedlington Terrier View Post
    Trouble for me 59er is I seriously question which is true or in accordance with empirically proven fact or someone's "reality" which is made up to suit an agenda.

    I simply refuse to trust anything that comes out of the mouths of this Cabal of Cabinet Minister Conservative and Unionist Cretins or their goons from SAGE.
    And the agenda is???

    From their website
    “SAGE is responsible for ensuring that timely and coordinated scientific advice is made available to decision makers to support UK cross-government decisions in the Cabinet Office Briefing Room (COBR).
    We The advice provided by SAGE does not represent official government policy.

    The membership of SAGE depends on the nature of the emergency but it typically includes leading experts from within government and leading specialists from the fields of academia and industry.”

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by oldcolner View Post
    And the agenda is???

    From their website
    “SAGE is responsible for ensuring that timely and coordinated scientific advice is made available to decision makers to support UK cross-government decisions in the Cabinet Office Briefing Room (COBR).
    We The advice provided by SAGE does not represent official government policy.

    The membership of SAGE depends on the nature of the emergency but it typically includes leading experts from within government and leading specialists from the fields of academia and industry.”
    Yeah right and the moon is made of green cheese.

  10. #10
    Significantly Cummings was a regular attendee at SAGE meetings and TWO members refuse to be disclosed.

    We should have a guessing contest I reckon.

    This is the rest of the gaggle with whom I am advised to trust my own and my family's life too.

    Sir Patrick Vallance, Government Chief Scientific Adviser
    Professor Chris Whitty, Chief Medical Officer and Chief Scientific Adviser, Department of Health and Social Care
    Professor John Aston, Chief Scientific Adviser, Home Office
    Professor Wendy Barclay, Imperial College London
    Professor Phil Blythe, Chief Scientific Adviser, Department for Transport
    Professor Ian Boyd, University of St Andrews
    Professor Andrew Curran, Chief Scientific Adviser, Health and Safety Executive
    Dr Gavin Debrera, Public Health England
    Professor Sir Ian Diamond, National Statistician, Office for National Statistics
    Professor Yvonne Doyle, Medical Director, Public Health England
    Professor John Edmunds, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
    Professor Sir Jeremy Farrar, Director Wellcome Trust
    Professor Neil Ferguson, Imperial College London
    Dr Aidan Fowler NHS England
    Professor Julia Gog University of Cambridge
    Dr David Halpern, Behavioural Insights Team, Cabinet Office
    Dr Jenny Harries, Deputy Chief Medical Officer
    Dr Demis Hassabis Data Scientist
    Professor Peter Horby University of Oxford
    Dr Indra Joshi NHS.
    Professor Dame Theresa Marteau University of Cambridge
    Professor Dame Angela McLean Chief Scientific Adviser Ministry of Defence
    Professor Graham Medley, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
    Professor Andrew Morris, University of Edinburgh
    Professor Carole Mundell, Chief Scientific Adviser, Foreign and Commonwealth Office
    Professor Cath Noakes, University of Leeds
    Dr Rob Offord, Welsh Government
    Professor Michael Parker, University of Oxford
    Professor Sharon Peacock, Public Health England
    Professor Alan Penn, Chief Scientific Adviser, Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
    Professor Steve Powis, NHS England
    Dr Mike Prentice, NHS England
    Mr Osama Rahman, Chief Scientific Adviser, Department of Education
    Professor Venki Ramakrishnan, Chair of DELVE (ex Officio), convened by Royal Society
    Professor Andrew Rambaut, University of Edinburgh
    Professor Tom Rodden, Chief Scientific Adviser, Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
    Professor Brooke Rogers, Kings College London
    Dr James Rubin, Kings College London
    Professor Calum Semple, University of Liverpool
    Dr Mike Short, Chief Scientific Adviser, Department for International Trade
    Dr Gregor Smith, Scottish Government Chief Medical Officer
    Professor Sir David Spieglhalter, University of Cambridge
    Professor Jonathan Van Tam, Deputy Chief Medical Officer
    Professor Russell Viner, University College London
    Professor Charlotte Watts, Chief Scientific Adviser, Department for International Development
    Professor Mark Walport, UK Research and Innovation
    Professor Mark Woolhouse, University of Edinburgh
    Professor Lucy Yardley, University of Bristol
    Professor Ian Young, Northern Ireland Executive
    Professor Maria Zambon, Public Health England

    When the government is your employer, I suppose one must toe the party line?

Page 98 of 281 FirstFirst ... 488896979899100108148198 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •