using supersallys theory.

[happytim]

ibrox is in no way connected to rangers .

heres how.

sally stated to me that when i questioned why rangers had not been sold but only the assets.

he stated to me that the club were one of the an assets of the company that ran them.

as other assets of that company would be things like murray park, ibrox etc, it stands to reason the club are one asset and ibrox is another asset, so there is no connection, they are both seperate assets, meaning ibrox has no connection to rangers the club, but only the new company that runs it.

another contradiction for ally to explain.

as many buns state rangers are the same club because they play at ibrox.

[angusros]

Reve everyone wae any sense or integrity knows Rangers are gone.

Only the deluded hvns and the old firm addicted mainstream press would have us believe different.

Problem is We will never forget.

[BertrandRussell]

A traditional sheep/Tim love-in. How nice.

[super_ally_rfc]

A traditional sheep/Tim love-in. How nice.

and another ramble from reve that makes no sense, clubs build new stadiums all the time and remain the same club so what exactly is your point?

[Taintedice]

Clubs don't build stadiums, companies do, ally, that's your view, best stick to it.

[happytim]

ally, dont have a pop at me, its your theory. that rangers the club were an asset of the old company, sold to the new company, just as the rest of the assets were including ibrox, this makes the club and ibrox seperate, while your hoarde of buns claim to be the same club because they still play at ibrox.

you dont need to tell me clubs, sorry companies build stadiums and stay the same club, i know these things.

[super_ally_rfc]

Clubs don't build stadiums, companies do, ally, that's your view, best stick to it.

companies are the legal persona of clubs so when i say the club builds the stadium i am correct. the only time club and company can be separated is during the liquidation process i know this concept is one that you struggle with, hope that helps

[happytim]

sally, the only way club and company can be seperated is when you want to seperate the honours/trophies/triumphs/stadium with the fekin debt and mismanagement.

ffs you should listen to yourself.

your a hoot.

[super_ally_rfc]

ally, dont have a pop at me, its your theory. that rangers the club were an asset of the old company, sold to the new company, just as the rest of the assets were including ibrox, this makes the club and ibrox seperate, while your hoarde of buns claim to be the same club because they still play at ibrox.

you dont need to tell me clubs, sorry companies build stadiums and stay the same club, i know these things.

reve its not my theory, its what actually happened according to the people who sold the club to newco and everyone else important who has commented on it - the only one with theories here is you, i only deal in facts

what exactly is your point here reve, youve just agreed that the stadium has no bearing on new/old club so what exactly is it you are trying to say

[super_ally_rfc]

sally, the only way club and company can be seperated is when you want to seperate the honours/trophies/triumphs/stadium with the fekin debt and mismanagement.

ffs you should listen to yourself.

your a hoot.

tainted you can continue on with your pish about this forever - it doesnt change the fact that what i have stated about the club and company being separated at liquidation is 100% true and is the accepted viewpoint a**** neutrals