a question for buns.

[happytim]

dont think this has been asked yet.

see when yous look back at successes from 2000-2011, are the memories ruined by the fact your club or holding company could not achieve this success without financial doping or cheating and breaking the laws. i mean it cant seem like a rangers success only when so many other companies and even football clubs supplied a lot of the dough to allow it to happen.

so in that respect those memories must be tarnished and empty.

[Jags4Me!]

They're empty shells of people, happyguy.

They're miserable, bitter, hate-filled wretches.

They don't feel anything but bitter hatred, so whether it was all tainted by lying, cheating, corruption, fraud (which it all was), doesn't matter a jot. They're incapable of feeling any emotion except hate and anger!

[tartanscone1314]

I like cream buns .

[super_ally_rfc]

dont think this has been asked yet.

see when yous look back at successes from 2000-2011, are the memories ruined by the fact your club or holding company could not achieve this success without financial doping or cheating and breaking the laws. i mean it cant seem like a rangers success only when so many other companies and even football clubs supplied a lot of the dough to allow it to happen.

so in that respect those memories must be tarnished and empty.

nope we didnt cheat and operated a legitimate tax avoidance scheme are your successes tainted by your apperently dodgy land deals with glagow council giving you a financial advantage?

[happytim]

you miss the point again ally, even when its obvious what i get at, you completely ignore the point of the dicsussion.

your club used other peoples money, it wouldnt be capable of getting such success if it was left to its own devices like everyone else was.

they spent money that wasnt thier own, including the £50 odd million that d murray wrote off by transfering the debt to his companies who then owed many creditors.



and yes they did cheat.

they were found guilty of breaking the rules, they knew they were doing it, so its cheating.

[super_ally_rfc]

you miss the point again ally, even when its obvious what i get at, you completely ignore the point of the dicsussion.

your club used other peoples money, it wouldnt be capable of getting such success if it was left to its own devices like everyone else was.

they spent money that wasnt thier own, including the A?50 odd million that d murray wrote off by transfering the debt to his companies who then owed many creditors.



and yes they did cheat.

they were found guilty of breaking the rules, they knew they were doing it, so its cheating.

we didnt cheat and we didnt use anyone elses money. simple as that, it might be your opinion that we cheated but as the actual evidence says we didnt you are wrong

notice you didnt address my point about celtic cheating

[happytim]

yous died caught with your hands in the till sally.

we all know it.

rangers used other peoples money, is a fact whether legal or not, it is moraly and ethically wrong and unsporting. and your club would never had been able to win if it was on a level playing field with everyone else.

[Taintedice]

ally's finally blown his load over these dodgy land deals

[super_ally_rfc]

ally's finally blown his load over these dodgy land deals

you have blown your load about 10 times a day for the last 2 years with the new club pish, there is more evidence for the dodgy land deals than any of the new club stuff - hope that helps

[gudge1903]

hope your right on the celtic land deals but i think your clutching at straws but hope to be proved wrong.

while we are on the subject there could be dodgey land deals down govan way since the newco is in a sticky financial postion.

hope you and your fellow newco bears are keeping an eye out.