It is down to the Manager pure and simple.
As I said when Pearce was appointed, he did not have the tactical nouse or experience for the Championship.
Love him or hate him we HAD the best manager for this job in Billy.
I did not think it was possible to be as bad as this lot but they proved me wrong, they must be the worst bunch of footballers Ihave ever seen (osbourn excluded) . They can't get by players, tackle players and always get the ball took of them, they can't see a good pass, in fact they are clueless. Some of the things they do and can't do are not the fault of the manager. Some of the responsability is the managers but the recent performances is down to the players and I think that some of them are just not good enough for a championship team. I can see derby getting 6 next week and a piont at fullam would be a miracal then we start the rellagation battle. I think we should have enough to stay up but it will be a hard struggle with this lot even with a new manager if pierce gets the sach...and he might
It is down to the Manager pure and simple.
As I said when Pearce was appointed, he did not have the tactical nouse or experience for the Championship.
Love him or hate him we HAD the best manager for this job in Billy.
And the players get off scott free, that is a load of tosh, yes the manager has to get things right but that performance by the players was disgracefull, a manager never tells his players to play like a bunch of useless ideots. You even get a performance from the bottem 3 team. You see teams get beat and they give it a good go but not this lot, im sorry but this lot has to take some flack and look at themselfs in the mirror and sort themselfs out. Look at leicester they are at the bottem but they are giving it a good go and have got some self pride...get your act together or go ALL OF YOU. ...I can remember pierce manageing forest before to try and stop relegation and getting manager of the month but it was to late and the players did try?
Best manager in billy ? You are having a laugh...as good as he was ( well at home ) wasn t this the same manager who could not win an away game ?
Billy has had two chances and was not good enough. When the big games came he bottled it. Should of been called choker lol.
Would you be saying that if the manager was S.o.d or McLaren or Cotterill? Pearce is getting defended because of who he is.Originally Posted by zidazaga
A great pl
Billy was the worst manager we have had for some time. He was destroying the club from the inside out. We are still repairing the damage now.Originally Posted by Bluebird21
It is little wonder that we have been the only mugs to employ him in the last six years.
I think sacking a manager every 6 months is the wrong way to go about it. Give him until the end of the season. If by then you've not improved start again and get a manager who has no Forest ties! Players and managers returning to clubs never seems to work out!
i kind of disgree here - best football forest have played since the Collymore and Roy days have been under Billy Davis - he is a very good manager IMO, but he is much better at being a di*k head! you cant have it all![]()
Ha ha is that some kind of joke. Do you mean the same Manager who had Forest playing the best football since Frank Clark.
The same Manager who took an average bunch of Championship footballers to two play off semis and would have this team promoted.
Yes he had his issues, you deal with them! It's like Kevin Pietersen and England. He's your best player so you manage him.
Absolutely spot on. He's a wally, but you deal with him being a wally,