rangers "success" from 2000 to 2011.

[happytim]

do any buns feel this has gone flat and yous dont take a lot of pleasure or satisfaction from this alleged success due to knowingly being found guilty of breaking the rules during this timescale to achieve this "success".

[John65]

[quote="happytim".[/quote]
lol - like they are going to say!
They couldn't even bring themselves to say a bad word about the hooligans assaulting two wee lassies, so you're unlikely to get anything out of them on this...

[happytim]

must be galling for them they cheated to get some success from what was possibly thier best ever side.

[eastcoastscot]

the tink reve is obsessed

[sideburnsam]

What were Rangers guilty of?

[happytim]

they were found guilty of non decleration of side contracts regarding the EBT.s which breached sfa rules.

and they were found to have knowingly mislead the authorities.

[sideburnsam]

Thought it was legal though?

Also were that no cleared of that

[Sir_Walter_Timslayer]

they were found guilty of non decleration of side contracts regarding the EBT.s which breached sfa rules.

and they were found to have knowingly mislead the authorities.

And the appropriate punishment was applied.

[happytim]

using ebt,s was declared legal, thats not what they were found guilty of, it was for breaking sfa rules for 11 years. the appropriatte punishment was not handed out.

football clubs who are punished dont get out of it by the fine applying to thier previous owners.

rangers should have been stripped of all silverware between these years.

cheating is cheating and should be treated as such.

[John65]

must be galling for them they cheated to get some success from what was possibly thier best ever side.

Aye, but they wouldn't have had that side if they hadn't cheated...