Coverage on Sky

[roger_ramjet]

Is a joke... virtually the whole game being shown from a camera on about the half way line, a few feet off the ground and without a wide angle lens. Totally shockingly bad. No depth perception, abother 10% of pitch visible during play, if that.

It's abysmal

[StensonRam]

Glad someone else thinks so, totally shocking camera angle, all you can see is legs

[Polish_ForestMad]

Hasn't it always been like that at pompy?when you watch highlights it's always been like that.must be where pompy sit the camera not where sky sit them!

[StensonRam]

Kind of a fans eye view camera angle

[ellafella]

Sky have apologised...health & safety testicles..

Derby's formation of 4-2-3-1 not really working. It's allowing P'smouth too much wide possession. I think I would switch it 2nd half to the diamond. Dawkins came into the game a little more later on first half but we haven't had any possession to enable us to threaten. It's all flash bang wallop....

[ramspride]

sky have apologised saying the camera angle was a H & S issue.Someone in a yellow vest has said that the camera man may suffer fram virtigo so they could not put their cameras above 15 feet. Before I retired I was H & S manager in the end I gave up as it became not H & S but damage liability on minimising claims. H & S is 90% common sence.

[paulo570]

Camera angle as bad as the first half performance.tactics wrong with the shape of the team,,,hope it changes second half..,

[ellafella]

oh Granty........................

[Polish_ForestMad]

Best keeper in the champ last season according to some.that was poor,even Carson would of saved that.

[Polish_ForestMad]

You do get a better perspective of how tall the players are.everyone looks 6ft plus