o/t How to win an argument without discussing the facts in 2015

[the_idiotb_stardson]

1. Use emotive language (compare your opponents views to Hitler, the Nazis.....also mention the holocaust)

2. Accuse your opponent of being racist (this usually closes the argument down immediately) saving you the job of engaging with the topic of discussion. You can also use homophobic, prejudice, ***ist etc)

3. If none of the above works, threaten prosecution with a "hate crime"

[gm_gm]

I know this isnt aimed at anyone in particular but I would add;

4. Hope they get assistance from their "Wiki wingman"

[Pocket rocket]

1. Use emotive language (compare your opponents views to Hitler, the Nazis.....also mention the holocaust)

2. Accuse your opponent of being racist (this usually closes the argument down immediately) saving you the job of engaging with the topic of discussion. You can also use homophobic, prejudice, ***ist etc)

3. If none of the above works, threaten prosecution with a "hate crime"

Spot on ibs

I copied and pasted that response

[frogmiller]

It really does feck me off when what seems an thought provoking thread gets trashed by do gooders!

The fact that the do gooders want everyone to be treat equally yet revert to calling.

3-2-1

[walter10]

1. Use emotive language (compare your opponents views to Hitler, the Nazis.....also mention the holocaust)

2. Accuse your opponent of being racist (this usually closes the argument down immediately) saving you the job of engaging with the topic of discussion. You can also use homophobic, prejudice, ***ist etc)

3. If none of the above works, threaten prosecution with a "hate crime"

Almost as bad as people arguing the existance of God without a shread of supporting evidence.