+ Visit Scotland Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Daily Record rapped for 'lies about rangers supporters'

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    3,020

    Daily Record rapped for 'lies about rangers supporters'

    A daily newspaper has been rapped by the press watchdog after running unverified claims about football fans’ behaviour from an anonymous source claiming to be a police officer.

    The Daily Record reported claims that Rangers FC supporters prevented police officers from entering Glasgow’s Hampden Park stadium to deal with disorder taking place on the pitch at this year’s Scottish FA Cup Final.

    The Glasgow-based Record quoted an unnamed police officer who said the fans started hitting, kicking and rocking police vans, adding a “mob mentality” prevailed outside the stadium, and that parents had used their children to block roads.

    The paper’s story said that this account was backed up by other anonymous officers, with quotes backing up the claims attributed to them.

    The article was accompanied by a smaller piece which said that the newspaper had put the accounts it had received from “multiple independent sources” to Police Scotland to be verified, but received a reply which did not address the matters raised.

    An unnamed man who was present at the alleged incident complained to the Independent Press Standards Organisation that the story breached Clause 1 (Accuracy) of the Editors’ Code of Practice.

    He said that it was nonsense to suggest that parents were using their children to block the road, denied that anybody hit or spat at police vans and said it was inaccurate to report that “everybody walking past” had taken part in what the article said had taken place.

    The Record responded that it had been unable to verify whether or not the person who sent the initial email was a police officer, but added the allegations had been set out as claims rather than facts, and that it had taken sufficient care over the article.

    It said that the account was checked with two further police sources not present, who said that there had been “chat” among officers about the incident and gave an account which tallied with the information in the email.

    The newspaper said it had also contacted the general secretary of the Scottish Police Federation, who said that some of the accounts he had heard accorded with the account provided in the email, and also provided a tweet from somebody who it said was a Rangers supporter who appeared to confirm that the incident had taken place.

    However IPSO found the Record had not contacted anyone able to provide a first hand account of what occurred after the match and had been unable to demonstrate that any of the sources it had relied on could reasonably be described as “independent”, as the article had claimed.

    The Committee added that in circumstances where Rangers supporters were accused of violence towards police, and other anti-social behaviour, the attempts it had made to support the account of an unidentified source it had been unable to verify were not sufficient to demonstrate that care had been taken over the accuracy of the article


    Oops..
    Lying tabloid found out again...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    957
    Quote Originally Posted by JackSnakes View Post
    A daily newspaper has been rapped by the press watchdog after running unverified claims about football fans’ behaviour from an anonymous source claiming to be a police officer.

    The Daily Record reported claims that Rangers FC supporters prevented police officers from entering Glasgow’s Hampden Park stadium to deal with disorder taking place on the pitch at this year’s Scottish FA Cup Final.

    The Glasgow-based Record quoted an unnamed police officer who said the fans started hitting, kicking and rocking police vans, adding a “mob mentality” prevailed outside the stadium, and that parents had used their children to block roads.

    The paper’s story said that this account was backed up by other anonymous officers, with quotes backing up the claims attributed to them.

    The article was accompanied by a smaller piece which said that the newspaper had put the accounts it had received from “multiple independent sources” to Police Scotland to be verified, but received a reply which did not address the matters raised.

    An unnamed man who was present at the alleged incident complained to the Independent Press Standards Organisation that the story breached Clause 1 (Accuracy) of the Editors’ Code of Practice.

    He said that it was nonsense to suggest that parents were using their children to block the road, denied that anybody hit or spat at police vans and said it was inaccurate to report that “everybody walking past” had taken part in what the article said had taken place.

    The Record responded that it had been unable to verify whether or not the person who sent the initial email was a police officer, but added the allegations had been set out as claims rather than facts, and that it had taken sufficient care over the article.

    It said that the account was checked with two further police sources not present, who said that there had been “chat” among officers about the incident and gave an account which tallied with the information in the email.

    The newspaper said it had also contacted the general secretary of the Scottish Police Federation, who said that some of the accounts he had heard accorded with the account provided in the email, and also provided a tweet from somebody who it said was a Rangers supporter who appeared to confirm that the incident had taken place.

    However IPSO found the Record had not contacted anyone able to provide a first hand account of what occurred after the match and had been unable to demonstrate that any of the sources it had relied on could reasonably be described as “independent”, as the article had claimed.

    The Committee added that in circumstances where Rangers supporters were accused of violence towards police, and other anti-social behaviour, the attempts it had made to support the account of an unidentified source it had been unable to verify were not sufficient to demonstrate that care had been taken over the accuracy of the article


    Oops..
    Lying tabloid found out again...





    I thought it was big Peter's mouthpiece.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    2,949
    I think it's time police disciplinary charges were brought against the corrupt scumbag of a police officer who collaborated with a yahoo boot of a journo to make up this story.

    Or is Police Scotland as institutionally corrupt as the Police Federation dude in question?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,739
    Quote Originally Posted by 54FairAndSquare View Post
    I think it's time police disciplinary charges were brought against the corrupt scumbag of a police officer who collaborated with a yahoo boot of a journo to make up this story.

    Or is Police Scotland as institutionally corrupt as the Police Federation dude in question?
    Aye,Ye canny get a decent quality Mason these days.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    6,541
    Quote Originally Posted by spameater1 View Post
    Aye,Ye canny get a decent quality Mason these days.


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    13,166
    Quote Originally Posted by 54FairAndSquare View Post
    I think it's time police disciplinary charges were brought against the corrupt scumbag of a police officer who collaborated with a yahoo boot of a journo to make up this story.

    Or is Police Scotland as institutionally corrupt as the Police Federation dude in question?
    rolf the poolboy says it was a fake email from a yahoo and then 54IQ filth contradicts him. Two huns left on this forum and they still can't get their stories straight, the sectarian hun filth are a hoot

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by 54FairAndSquare View Post
    I think it's time police disciplinary charges were brought against the corrupt scumbag of a police officer who collaborated with a yahoo boot of a journo to make up this story.

    Or is Police Scotland as institutionally corrupt as the Police Federation dude in question?
    I agree brother, an email is sent from a lying yahoo, probably Phil the gobblegiver or another unrepentant, then the yahoo police officer backs up the lies with the yahoo tramp at the record in an attempt to remove any blame for the incredibly poor response by police Scotland.

    Stating the Rangers fans used their children to block the roads putting them in grave danger of being killed by these "speeding" police vans and then attacked the police in the vans is up there with the lies the police stated after the Hillsborough disaster, but it feeds the yahoo and diddy propaganda machine and serve to the slavering hoards.

    Not surprising from a rag that would describe a serious assault by a celtc fan as "a man from Paisley wearing a green and white hooped top", and also publish the Hamas lovers fan rag.

    The lying copper and the yahoo tramp should be sacked forthwith.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    13,166
    So rolf is now claiming there was a police officer involved, contradicting himself in the process

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •