I don't think 4 is a bad idea. No more though.
Maybe keep it at 3 for tactical changes and be allowed an extra 1 for injury's. But i suppose people would just take advantage of that and bend the rules by saying he was carrying a knock or whatever.
|
| + Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Agree or not?
It's a No from me.
Think the link is trying to tell him something?
http://dailym.ai/2gpxusy
I don't think 4 is a bad idea. No more though.
Maybe keep it at 3 for tactical changes and be allowed an extra 1 for injury's. But i suppose people would just take advantage of that and bend the rules by saying he was carrying a knock or whatever.
He knows what the rules are and is merely trying to influence the fact he has a massive squad and by using the fantastic players available to him it may help him see off the opposition if they have a far less inferior bench of players..,,
It's a no from me....
He wants to be thankful it's not the 60's or early 70's where subs weren't used!
Now that was proper managing.....
change it to use 4 subs but your only allowed to do 2 substitutions. so you choose add 4 players in one go or 3n1 or 2n2 or 2n1 if your only other sub is scott allan
"Just Say No" to people trying to change the rules of our game ffs.
Imagine if Europe started to get serious about baseball and tried to tell the Americans they needed to change rules etc!!!
Trouble is we will stand for owt!!!!