Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Premier League AGM

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    424

    Premier League AGM

    No idea about the format of this and probably a token gesture that theyll have to go through. Undoubtedly itll be as toothless as a Cumbrian gurning champion when it comes to controlling the self interest of certain clubs, but it would be good if someone proposed that the O&D test is freshly applied and binding to all current owners - seconder please? Not bldy likely! Go on Lee I dare you

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    846
    I trust our fearless chairman to ask the big questions "how many sugars? and would you like milk in that?". Seriously though we would need him or other chairmen to raise the issue and as we have seen the elite would veto it anyway. I would love to see it raised but you know it wont be

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    424
    Quote Originally Posted by malamoto View Post
    I trust our fearless chairman to ask the big questions "how many sugars? and would you like milk in that?". Seriously though we would need him or other chairmen to raise the issue and as we have seen the elite would veto it anyway. I would love to see it raised but you know it wont be


    You can just imagine - Penfold gets there early brimming with his characteristic enthusiasm and go-getting attitude and happens to be standing next to the door of the board room waiting for the others to arrive then everybody starts handing him their coats when they get there!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    846
    You know Mad Lee . He is completely hatstand man

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    19,818
    Hsha 11 clubs voted against keeping 5 subs fir next season - bet the top 6 werent amongst them

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    3,666
    Quote Originally Posted by toonlegend View Post
    Hsha 11 clubs voted against keeping 5 subs fir next season - bet the top 6 werent amongst them
    That is quite interesting numbers, I say that because I am not sure if the 3 relegated or promoted teams would have been represented. If not that leaves 17 teams, if 11 voted against, that would mean only the self elected top 6 voted in favour.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    42,773
    Well we all knew they liked it.

    It was a rule that only supported them passed this ****ed up season.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •