Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 74

Thread: v Sheep (a)

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    14,101

    v Sheep (a)

    Early doors...

    Your chance to predict the starting 11.
    What do you think our line up will be as chosen by Tam and what would your preferred lineup be?
    Does Tam know his best 11 after 4 LC games where nearly everyone got some game time?

    A cyber case of beer to anyone who guesses his starting 11 correctly. Obviously you can amend your choice if by some miracle we have incoming.

    Will we get hard earned point? Or even a win? Predictions welcome.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    2,234
    Line up I would go for:

    Siegrist

    Neilson
    Edwards
    Mulgrew

    Freeman
    Fuchs
    Butcher
    Robson

    Chalmers
    Mochrie
    Shankland

    What line up do I expect? No idea but definitely Pawlett for Mochrie. Maybe even Butcher in the back 3 with Harkes beside Fuchs. Will be disappointed if that happens though. Neilson or K Smith should play every game we play a back 3. If it is Clark and Pawlett behind Shankland then its COURTS OUT. Jokes of course, but we wont win the game with those guys up top imo.

    My prediction is 1-1.

  3. #3
    want:

    Siegrist

    Neilson
    Edwards
    Mulgrew

    Freeman
    Fuchs
    Butcher
    Sporle

    Chalmers
    Mochrie
    Shankland

    will Get:

    Siegrist

    Edwards
    Mulgrew
    Reynolds

    Smith
    Fuchs
    Butcher
    Robson

    Harkes
    Clarke
    Shankland

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    9,007
    Want:

    Siegrist
    Smith Edwards Mulgrew
    Freeman Fuchs Butcher Mochrie Duffy
    Clark Shankland

    Will be:

    Siegrist
    F*cknows Edwards Mulgrew
    Freeman Fuchs Butcher Pawlett Duffy
    Clark Shankland

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    14,101
    Quote Originally Posted by BudMill90 View Post
    Line up I would go for:

    Siegrist

    Neilson
    Edwards
    Mulgrew

    Freeman
    Fuchs
    Butcher
    Robson

    Chalmers
    Mochrie
    Shankland

    What line up do I expect? No idea but definitely Pawlett for Mochrie. Maybe even Butcher in the back 3 with Harkes beside Fuchs. Will be disappointed if that happens though. Neilson or K Smith should play every game we play a back 3. If it is Clark and Pawlett behind Shankland then its COURTS OUT. Jokes of course, but we wont win the game with those guys up top imo.

    My prediction is 1-1.
    Its tombola time again isn't it.
    I know the team I'd send out but guessing Tams is the tricky bit 😁

    My selection.. .kind of fluid front 6

    ................Benji
    ..Mulgrew Edwards Reynolds
    ...............Fuchs
    Freeman Hoti Mochrie Robson
    ....Chalmers
    ...................Shankland

    5 Academy graduates hopefully that meets the bar 😎

    What I think we will get from Tam

    Benji
    Mulgrew Edwards Reynolds
    L Smith Butcher Pawlett Harkes Robson
    Shankland Clark

    Prediction my team 1-1
    Prediction Tams team 2-0

  6. #6
    I would go for......

    Benji
    L.Smith Edwards Mulgrew
    Freeman Fuchs Butcher Robson
    Pawlett Shankland Chalmers

    For some reason I think we might throw Keir Smith in to start with but I can see Freeman moving to LWB esp if Robson isn't ready/Gone

  7. #7
    If we're going to persist with the 3 at the back nonsense, then it's got to change to 352. 343 is utter ****e. Shankland looks just as lost as last season under this stupid system. Mellon persisted with 3 (its really 1) up front all the way through last season's garbage. If we want to keep the ball in the opposition half you have to have 2 strikers close enough to each other, in a central area, to be able to pass the ball to each other. Let the wing backs have something to aim at when (if) they hit the byline.

  8. #8
    352 was what we done under mellon. Clark or Pawlett would being the link player from midfield to Shankland and McNulty but would usually drop back to be a 3 man midfield

    343 if done correctly can be effective (look at what st johnstone done, Although they did mix it up)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    4,425
    ................Benji
    ...L. Smith Edwards Mulgrew
    Freeman........................Robson
    .....Fuchs...........new player
    ..............Mochrie
    .....new big b4stard forrit...Shanks

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    2,234
    Quote Originally Posted by swanny14 View Post
    If we're going to persist with the 3 at the back nonsense, then it's got to change to 352. 343 is utter ****e. Shankland looks just as lost as last season under this stupid system. Mellon persisted with 3 (its really 1) up front all the way through last season's garbage. If we want to keep the ball in the opposition half you have to have 2 strikers close enough to each other, in a central area, to be able to pass the ball to each other. Let the wing backs have something to aim at when (if) they hit the byline.
    Have you watched the games?

Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •